[ Closed ] a320neo JARDesign ver 2.7r1 WIN/MAC 64 bit (X-Plane 10) (Page 9 of 10)

I had several times the same problem.

yes its a typo, we are still waiting!!

I've noticed that PFD and ND comes available even IRS is not aligned yet (ECAM memo says "Xmin to align"). It really should not show anything until IRS is aligned

I have reinstalled Xplane 10 from 0, when installing a320neo I have started it but it does not ask me serial, nor does it appear the box where to insert it.
please help
PS I downloaded the latest version available (not Beta)

XP10 newest update (because usually people have) also this is A320 ver 2.7r1 topic so it is quite obvious that aircraft is in current version. What comes with hardware I really don't think this has nothing to do with hardware. It is clearly a bug in the aircraft.

Test flight EIDW/EGLL - 320v2.7r1 and XP11v.b9
bugs:
1 ADIRS time remaining display - dark
2 Panel light regulation (under the AP unit) don't work
3 Flood light regulation on pedestal don't work
4 MCDU INIT extra time - fault data !!
5 TCAS stays dark - no information !!
6 TOC sign not on green line
7 XL "create flightplan" (I didn't file myself a flightplan) got a flightplan from EIDW to EGLL over halt of the world 140000 nm
8 Touch Down speedbrakes and thrust reversers didn't work although initiated !!

Despite this bugs I could execute the flight from cold and dark and land manually at EGLL - after delete of 20 WP :-(

In connection with XP11:

1 The disturbing play of brightness and shadow in the cockpit complicate the view on the instruments, which are partly not readable in the dark part
2 I made a short video about light signals from several chisels between the cockpit instruments ( flickering white points and lines)
https://youtu.be/LZ_8BAZLN1I

PS: The landscape in XP11 during the approach to EGLL airport makes me very much aware of the computer game "Sim City" (ver.4). Houses and streets with traffic are completely unrealistic. I still can not understand the overwhelming enthusiasm of the XP11 fans......

I suspect the new version will be out a few weeks after X-plane 11 is out of beta stage. Until then there are just too many changes done to the sim that it's futile to even start developing anything for it.

Having said all that, I am switching back to FSX (or P3D) so that I can enjoy a proper simulation of an A320 made by FSLabs. JAR Design's A320neo is a nice aircraft but there are so many problems even in the XP10 version that have not been addressed yet (and god knows if they ever will!!)

Under XP10.51, JAR A320neo last version is running very stable. Beta test flight under XP11 can give hints what must be in work....   I am sure that JAR knows well about most bugs, but maybe we find what occurs on other machine under specific configuration...

FS Labs A320-X, as I saw in a tutorial video made by Airline2Sim (real world pilots) is no doubt a professional edition of this model. I am using only XP so have fun ....

JAR airliner models were never 100% stable, but qualitative seen there is no alternative for XP user, so beta tests will have to keep on going....

I am not questioning the stability, which I think is impressive! But I do worry about the problems that need to be fixed. This forum is full of reports but there's no response from JARD to any of them...

FSLabs A320-X is a normal FSX/P3D add-on for a flight simmer like you and me, not just for pros... Though, it costs a bit more than usual.

I think you nailed it here. For as long as there's no other company building add-ons for XP, the quality of those available will be average at best. Now the XP11 looks absolutely amazing so I'm keeping it installed and will wait until a quality A320 plane exists for this platform and might switch back

@galaio.silva,
1 X-Plane is no doubt the best flight sim on market and not because of its graphic engine moreover because of its avionic concept
2 Jar is no doubt the best Airbus developer and his models are the only useful in XP. I hope to see in near future the new A350 ...
3 Both JAR A320/A330 are stable under XP10.51 ! Most complains are caused by system configuration and add-ons  a n d mistakes made by simmer not going deep enough into Pilot Reference Guide. I bet that 80% of all questions and complains will be unnecessary!
4 Think about that nearly every XP beta need a respond on aircraft model developer side. This seems to be a not ending process.
5 The last point is the reason of our beta tests.

@GEK_the_Reaper (wired chosen name)
are you using another simulation software?
If yes it will be very interested to hear about the  v behavior of other A320 aircraft models....

I saw FSLabs A320 in a video of real world pilots on Airline2Sim - very impressive !
The constrains are included in the flight plans data that are based on X-Plane data source (in case of JAR aircraft GNS430 data source). This data I Think includes for some reason mostly FL constrains for STAR, but I experienced sometimes also SP and FL constrains during take-off....

Hello JAR, may be i ask noob questions but:

Self Ask Self Answer:

Q: How to correct update AIRAC for this plane, step in read me doesn't help.
(v.2.7 use NavData from ../X-PLANE 10/Custom Data/GNS430/navdata/ folder). I did update Custom Data .dat files, create GNS430 folder and extract NavData from jardesign_a320neo_native_1703.zip to this folder. But in FMS i see AIRAC 1601 why?
Feeling that it is taken from the system folder not from "Custom Data/GNS430" but  "Resources/Default Data"...
Hmm, Or i need put .dat files to NavData folder in GNS430 ?
A: package miss cycle_info.txt file, copy it from system folder GNS430, and replace AIRAC version.

Q: Can't set auto brake MAX on panel, click... green light blink and no on position
(such as this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeHigh6Rzoc )
A: You can switch auto brake when cockpit preparation after APU started

But need answer for two question:
- And yeah feel APU eat much fuel, may be like in real, but...

- If i buy license key, should i have update later ? ^__^
Or i need pay for all major update ?