251

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

MrGeeBee wrote:
dudleybrooke wrote:

Crash when entering flightplan.


Additionally, I couldn't get the flightplan to load as a company route.

Your FLP:

KSFO SID SYRAH Q128 JSICA DCT ILC DCT KD45S DCT KK39A DCT FSM DCT MEM DCT HUTCC DCT KNSAW DCT RUSSA STAR KATL

Your FP in SkyVector:

KSFO SYRAH JSICA ILC KD45S KK39A FSM MEM HUTCC KNSAW RUSSA KATL

And in your Log:

FMGS: 553 : ICAO-format plan export to Dataref: KSFO SID NTELL DCT CABAB DCT KICHI DCT KATTS DCT KITTN DCT ROCCY DCT HASSL DCT TAHIB DCT DIXAN DCT MIRME DCT PNH DCT CRUSR DCT IRW DCT TUL DCT PLIED DCT LUKKY DCT ARG DCT ZESAM DCT KIMEL DCT SOPIE DCT BNA DCT LGC STAR KATL
FMGS: 596 : add Leg: I10,IF,CTEEE,33.620017,-84.651053,IOMO,275.0,11.8,2,4000,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 596 : add Leg: I10,CF,ZMANN,33.620169,-84.550981,0,IOMO,275.0,6.8,95.0,5.0,1,2700,0,0,0,0,2,0
FMGS: 596 : add Leg: I10,CF,RW10,33.620272,-84.447878,0,IOMO,275.0,1.7,95.0,5.2,1,1055,0,0,0,0,3,0
FMGS: 596 : add Leg: I10,CA,0,95.0,2,1400,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 596 : add Leg: I10,CF,SCARR,33.378639,-84.435069,2,ATL,185.0,15.0,185.0,15.0,2,3000,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 596 : add Leg: I10,HM,SCARR,33.378639,-84.435069,2, ,0.0,0.0,5.0,04.3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 596 : MessageRed: Missed Leg: I10,HM,SCARR,33.378639,-84.435069,2, ,0.0,0.0,5.0,04.3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0

The first plan was produced by SimBrief and the second was produced by Goodway and injected directly.

252

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

dudleybrooke wrote:
MrGeeBee wrote:
dudleybrooke wrote:

Crash when entering flightplan.


Additionally, I couldn't get the flightplan to load as a company route.

Your FLP:

KSFO SID SYRAH Q128 JSICA DCT ILC DCT KD45S DCT KK39A DCT FSM DCT MEM DCT HUTCC DCT KNSAW DCT RUSSA STAR KATL

Your FP in SkyVector:

KSFO SYRAH JSICA ILC KD45S KK39A FSM MEM HUTCC KNSAW RUSSA KATL

And in your Log:

FMGS: 553 : ICAO-format plan export to Dataref: KSFO SID NTELL DCT CABAB DCT KICHI DCT KATTS DCT KITTN DCT ROCCY DCT HASSL DCT TAHIB DCT DIXAN DCT MIRME DCT PNH DCT CRUSR DCT IRW DCT TUL DCT PLIED DCT LUKKY DCT ARG DCT ZESAM DCT KIMEL DCT SOPIE DCT BNA DCT LGC STAR KATL
FMGS: 596 : add Leg: I10,IF,CTEEE,33.620017,-84.651053,IOMO,275.0,11.8,2,4000,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 596 : add Leg: I10,CF,ZMANN,33.620169,-84.550981,0,IOMO,275.0,6.8,95.0,5.0,1,2700,0,0,0,0,2,0
FMGS: 596 : add Leg: I10,CF,RW10,33.620272,-84.447878,0,IOMO,275.0,1.7,95.0,5.2,1,1055,0,0,0,0,3,0
FMGS: 596 : add Leg: I10,CA,0,95.0,2,1400,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 596 : add Leg: I10,CF,SCARR,33.378639,-84.435069,2,ATL,185.0,15.0,185.0,15.0,2,3000,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 596 : add Leg: I10,HM,SCARR,33.378639,-84.435069,2, ,0.0,0.0,5.0,04.3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 596 : MessageRed: Missed Leg: I10,HM,SCARR,33.378639,-84.435069,2, ,0.0,0.0,5.0,04.3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0

The first plan was produced by SimBrief and the second was produced by Goodway and injected directly.

Yes, but it's not even the same route so I can't see the connection.

The second route is even very strange:

http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/4411/t/p1c6q0j5smt7b3d01iln1fimuea3.png

253

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Peter092 wrote:

Hello

The A330 is a very nice plane that gives me satisfaction.
But two problems:

1 / impossible to remove the discontinuity located after the airport of departure. Obligation of an SID.
NB: In the V2, it was possible and interesting to make "takeoff-landing loops"

2 / IMPORTANT : the A330 cannot follow the LNAV and VNAV parameters of the MCDU. As a result, the A330 loses AUTO-PILOT, speed, altitude, etc.

Here is a 7 minute video to show you the problems. Here : https://drive.google.com/file/d/107aXLK … sp=sharing

Flight LFSB (Basel-Mulhouse) - LFPO
RWY 33
SID: LUME6N
AIRAC: 1801 - January 2018.

Thank you for your attention. Best regards.

Peter (in French)

Hi Peter092

I have just done same flight LFSB/LFPO with same SID ...Without any trouble ...

I noticed in your video that you did not finish your flight plan (it still exists a discontinuity) (may be for getting a not too long video) ... but in that case you cannot adjust the fuel prediction . To know what fuel quantity is needed you have to finilize the flight plan , then fill the PERF page (1 and 2) . This fix center of gravity ...and so on ...

I suggest you make a try with these conditions .
Regards
jcdp

I7 5930k @ 3,5Ghz , 32 Go Ram, NVidia 970 4Go , W10 64 bits, SSD 500Go , HD 3To
Moniteur Acer K242HQK (3840x2160)
CH Products : Flight Sim Yoke , Pro pedals
X-plane 11.41r2

254

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

MrGeeBee wrote:

Beta 5:

1. (Minor glitch) You have to exit and restart X-Plane to get rid of the Rainshield after first activation. Reloading the aircraft is not good enough. (No big deal though.)

2. When in TOGA and then pulling back throttle to climb, the AP goes wild and sets the ATHR to TOGALK, even above the AF. Only way way is to disengage the ATHR, match the TOGA speed manually and reacttivate ATHR again.

3. At TOD sometimes, tuning in your ILS altitude, and the aircraft starts to decent at 8000 FPM. (Only happens sometimes, so I'm not sure how to reproduce yet, working on it.)

4. Also glitch with refueling, when calling only the Gasoline Truck from GHD no refuel window appear. If calling all things it appears.

(Video still processing on YT... https://youtu.be/9TMKOefAKCQ?list=PLEMT … Gkqy-rEc-j )


I'll saw the same things on your posts from points 1 to 3, but with gasoline truck I have no problem.

I'll try the make plan generated with new tools-instant flightplan, but plan have the same problems like X-life plan maker with open air space over Europe ( Austria, Slovenia,...)

Otherwise I like to fly with this plane and JAR keep up the great work!

My setup: Windows 10 (64-bit), Z490 AORUS PRO AX, INTEL i7 10700k, 32GB DDR4 RAM, NVIDIA Geforce GTX 2070S 8GB
X-Plane 11.55, X-Plane12RC2, Flight PRO joke, Logitech panels
My Fleet:  JD320-V3.8R1  with copilot, JD330-V4.4B3 with copilot, ZIBO 737-800X,
Utilities: X-LIFE Deluxe verversion 4.30 latest, FMcar latest, GHD ver. latest, X Camera,BSS JAR A320 V4,Better pushback

255

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

The point was not the routing, but the fact that the supplied route produces an error in the MCDU when I try to load it.  The vagaries of the route aren't really relevant, I could have gone via Tahiti for all it mattered.

256

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

dudleybrooke wrote:

The point was not the routing, but the fact that the supplied route produces an error in the MCDU when I try to load it.  The vagaries of the route aren't really relevant, I could have gone via Tahiti for all it mattered.

Sure if all points were connected, but they are not and therefore an MCDU error, and in this case a CTD. CTD shouldn't happen, but the plan is still faulty.

257

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Hi Mr.Romanov,

I deleted all files (as explained on page 1 of this topic) of the version 3 Beta 1 airplane.
I installed the airplane (Beta5), opened Steam and started the "game" with the default airplane 747, I changed to JAR A330, opened the activation window where I put my serial number, then exit the "game", I returned with the JAR330 and those warning of GroundHandling that I had mentioned in another post did not appear anymore.
Thanks for the update

I7-8700k - MSi Z370 Plus Sli - Galax RTX 2070 - G.Skill 16gb 3000mhz - SSD MX 500 -500gb, Hd 1tb Seagate, HD 2tb Wd - WC Corsair H100iv2 - Corsair RM 650 - Monitor 24'' Asus

258 (edited by frizzleboy 2018-02-20 20:57:31)

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/6313/t/p1c6qg3a9r1f006b31l91hiu8f23.jpg
Good evening. On final i have a warning about overspeed, but my Vapp was 180kts , not more. I received this warning every time I was on final to rwy.

259

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

frizzleboy wrote:

http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/6313/t/p1c6qg3a9r1f006b31l91hiu8f23.jpg
Good evening. On final i have a warning about overspeed, but my Vapp was 180kts , not more. I received this warning every time I was on final to rwy.

Well, VApp is a float, so it could be 180.9 and maybe rounded up to 181 and hence a warning.

260

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

jcdp wrote:
Peter092 wrote:

Hello

The A330 is a very nice plane that gives me satisfaction.
But two problems:

1 / impossible to remove the discontinuity located after the airport of departure. Obligation of an SID.
NB: In the V2, it was possible and interesting to make "takeoff-landing loops"

2 / IMPORTANT : the A330 cannot follow the LNAV and VNAV parameters of the MCDU. As a result, the A330 loses AUTO-PILOT, speed, altitude, etc.

Here is a 7 minute video to show you the problems. Here : https://drive.google.com/file/d/107aXLK … sp=sharing

Flight LFSB (Basel-Mulhouse) - LFPO
RWY 33
SID: LUME6N
AIRAC: 1801 - January 2018.

Thank you for your attention. Best regards.

Peter (in French)

Hi Peter092

I have just done same flight LFSB/LFPO with same SID ...Without any trouble ...

I noticed in your video that you did not finish your flight plan (it still exists a discontinuity) (may be for getting a not too long video) ... but in that case you cannot adjust the fuel prediction . To know what fuel quantity is needed you have to finilize the flight plan , then fill the PERF page (1 and 2) . This fix center of gravity ...and so on ...

I suggest you make a try with these conditions .
Regards
jcdp


jcdp  I really appreciate your patience and relax !  When I read all error messages and complaints in the last time I lose patience very quickly. Even in this case, after the obvious large number of errors that were made, it is obvious  that the take-off must gone badly. I also made a short video about the same flight and - oh my... - everything went as usual. But even if you offer videos for training  (that means a lot of effort) in the end hardly anyone is interested. It is easier to ask than working yourself up the matter ....     https://youtu.be/APoMBzdwoSM

X-Plane 11.30r3 | iMac27 OSX Mojave 14.10.4, | Samsung ultra-wide screen 49-inch | Saitek equipment | MFG pedals |Gladiator Joystick | Plugins: GndHandling, RWC, SMP, SoundM, X-Life, BetterPushback, AutoGate, SoundMaxx, X-ATC-chatter, X-Camera | iPad 12.9, iPad Air 9.7  | Airliner: JAR A320/A330, FF A350XWB, FF B767, SSG B747-8 inter, Epic1000 new, TBM900  http://ilankrt1.blogspot.co.il

261

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Hello,

I'm still received CTD on entering CRZ/TEMP.
Steps:
1. GPU = ON
2. Batteries = ON
3. GPU B Avail = ON
4. FMGS - Init
5. FMGS - Plan = LKPR/UMMS, R1, NON (without plan generation)
6. FMGS - Flight Number = CSA615
7. FMGS - Align IRS
8. FMGS - CRZ/TEMP = 410/-48 ===> CTD

A330 V3B5, XP11.11

Post's attachments

Attachment icon fmgs.dmp 149.98 kb, 358 downloads since 2018-02-20 

Attachment icon Log.txt 42.25 kb, 362 downloads since 2018-02-20 

262

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

At tod the aircraft increases the acceleration of the engines when we started the managed descent.

This did not happen in beta 4.

263 (edited by jcdp 2018-02-21 07:56:33)

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Wangenheim wrote:

Hello,

I'm still received CTD on entering CRZ/TEMP.
Steps:
1. GPU = ON
2. Batteries = ON
3. GPU B Avail = ON
4. FMGS - Init
5. FMGS - Plan = LKPR/UMMS, R1, NON (without plan generation)
6. FMGS - Flight Number = CSA615
7. FMGS - Align IRS
8. FMGS - CRZ/TEMP = 410/-48 ===> CTD

A330 V3B5, XP11.11

Hi
Before FL410 was not accepted ...I do not know if it is now .
I had CTD if I tried to enter FL AND temp ...
When entering only FL (such as 390 for instance ) it works ... writing level and temp .

Regards
jcdp

I7 5930k @ 3,5Ghz , 32 Go Ram, NVidia 970 4Go , W10 64 bits, SSD 500Go , HD 3To
Moniteur Acer K242HQK (3840x2160)
CH Products : Flight Sim Yoke , Pro pedals
X-plane 11.41r2

264

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Wangenheim wrote:

Hello,

I'm still received CTD on entering CRZ/TEMP.
Steps:
1. GPU = ON
2. Batteries = ON
3. GPU B Avail = ON
4. FMGS - Init
5. FMGS - Plan = LKPR/UMMS, R1, NON (without plan generation)
6. FMGS - Flight Number = CSA615
7. FMGS - Align IRS
8. FMGS - CRZ/TEMP = 410/-48 ===> CTD

A330 V3B5, XP11.11

I get "Data Missing", but that's because there is no FP. I tried the same as yours, and when completed a FP it worked fine. Entering FL should be addressed, either it's accepting a FL from start or it should be on last stage after entering a FP.

265

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Good flight from EGCC to LFPG with 330v3b5 in XP 11.20b3. Aircraft did everything it should have done, managed the approach and kept pretty much on profile until I took over, then got told my next landing will be better. Plane 10, me 0.
I did notice the aircraft was swinging about a little following the magenta line of the plan, but not a real problem.

Would it be possible that when you turn off the frames warning in the MCDU it stays off, instead of having to keep turning it off every time you fire up the A330.

266

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Hello,

again and sorry to show you perhaps a new problem: sometimes the spoliers do not work.

In this video, I do a flight training "take-off loops" LFPO RWY20 - LFPO ILS06.

You may find that the spoiler lever operates in manual and landing but the spoilers do not come out.

Other theft, they work.

Here is the video : https://drive.google.com/file/d/141BjhN … sp=sharing

NB:
Starting runningFlight engines LFPO-LFPO
AIRAC: 1801 - January 2018.
Starting runningX-plane engines 11.10
Windows 10
Plugins, Skymax Pro only.

Thank you for your attention. Best regards.
Peter (in French)

267 (edited by ilankrt 2018-02-21 14:43:15)

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Peter092 wrote:

Hello,

again and sorry to show you perhaps a new problem: sometimes the spoliers do not work.

In this video, I do a flight training "take-off loops" LFPO RWY20 - LFPO ILS06.

You may find that the spoiler lever operates in manual and landing but the spoilers do not come out.

Other theft, they work.

Here is the video : https://drive.google.com/file/d/141BjhN … sp=sharing

NB:
Starting runningFlight engines LFPO-LFPO
AIRAC: 1801 - January 2018.


Was this a realtime video or it was recorded afterwards?  I am used to record my landings afterwards knowing that speedbrakes in  open position are not seen on this records... To see if speedbrakes deployed I stop the simulation looking after their position...

X-Plane 11.30r3 | iMac27 OSX Mojave 14.10.4, | Samsung ultra-wide screen 49-inch | Saitek equipment | MFG pedals |Gladiator Joystick | Plugins: GndHandling, RWC, SMP, SoundM, X-Life, BetterPushback, AutoGate, SoundMaxx, X-ATC-chatter, X-Camera | iPad 12.9, iPad Air 9.7  | Airliner: JAR A320/A330, FF A350XWB, FF B767, SSG B747-8 inter, Epic1000 new, TBM900  http://ilankrt1.blogspot.co.il

268

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

ilankrt wrote:
jcdp wrote:
Peter092 wrote:

Hello

The A330 is a very nice plane that gives me satisfaction.
But two problems:

1 / impossible to remove the discontinuity located after the airport of departure. Obligation of an SID.
NB: In the V2, it was possible and interesting to make "takeoff-landing loops"

2 / IMPORTANT : the A330 cannot follow the LNAV and VNAV parameters of the MCDU. As a result, the A330 loses AUTO-PILOT, speed, altitude, etc.

Here is a 7 minute video to show you the problems. Here : https://drive.google.com/file/d/107aXLK … sp=sharing

Flight LFSB (Basel-Mulhouse) - LFPO
RWY 33
SID: LUME6N
AIRAC: 1801 - January 2018.

Thank you for your attention. Best regards.

Peter (in French)

Hi Peter092

I have just done same flight LFSB/LFPO with same SID ...Without any trouble ...

I noticed in your video that you did not finish your flight plan (it still exists a discontinuity) (may be for getting a not too long video) ... but in that case you cannot adjust the fuel prediction . To know what fuel quantity is needed you have to finilize the flight plan , then fill the PERF page (1 and 2) . This fix center of gravity ...and so on ...

I suggest you make a try with these conditions .
Regards
jcdp


jcdp  I really appreciate your patience and relax !  When I read all error messages and complaints in the last time I lose patience very quickly. Even in this case, after the obvious large number of errors that were made, it is obvious  that the take-off must gone badly. I also made a short video about the same flight and - oh my... - everything went as usual. But even if you offer videos for training  (that means a lot of effort) in the end hardly anyone is interested. It is easier to ask than working yourself up the matter ....     https://youtu.be/APoMBzdwoSM

Please do not lose patience.

Jcdp had a very good idea: "I suggest you make a try with these conditions."

So, I made the flight again: same parameters but by checking well the paln of flight and the absence of disontinuity.

Without discontinuity: SAME RESULT !!! The proof in video :https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QwTHLX … sp=sharing

And, I do not lose patience, the proof I take my time to show you what does not seem to work and without remarks and without negative criticism.

Thank you for your attention. Best regards.
Peter (in French)

269

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

ilankrt wrote:
Peter092 wrote:

Hello,

again and sorry to show you perhaps a new problem: sometimes the spoliers do not work.

In this video, I do a flight training "take-off loops" LFPO RWY20 - LFPO ILS06.

You may find that the spoiler lever operates in manual and landing but the spoilers do not come out.

Other theft, they work.

Here is the video : https://drive.google.com/file/d/141BjhN … sp=sharing

NB:
Starting runningFlight engines LFPO-LFPO
AIRAC: 1801 - January 2018.


Was this a realtime video or it was recorded afterwards?  I am used to record my landings afterwards knowing that speedbrakes in  open position are not seen on this records... To see if speedbrakes deployed I stop the simulation looking after their position...


Video in real time, that's why the plane does not go straight on the track.
When we do a replay, the screens do not give the flight information.

270

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

"
Please do not lose patience.
Jcdp had a very good idea: "I suggest you make a try with these conditions."
So, I made the flight again: same parameters but by checking well the paln of flight and the absence of disontinuity.
Without discontinuity: SAME RESULT !!! The proof in video :https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QwTHLX … sp=sharing
And, I do not lose patience, the proof I take my time to show you what does not seem to work and without remarks and without negative criticism.
Thank you for your attention. Best regards.
Peter (in French)
"

Hi peter092
Well I have no more suggestion.
You look very unlucky ...

When you get such an issue it could be usefull for JAR to attach the log.txt and fmgs.txt files with your message .

Regards
jcdp

I7 5930k @ 3,5Ghz , 32 Go Ram, NVidia 970 4Go , W10 64 bits, SSD 500Go , HD 3To
Moniteur Acer K242HQK (3840x2160)
CH Products : Flight Sim Yoke , Pro pedals
X-plane 11.41r2

271

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

MrGeeBee wrote:
dudleybrooke wrote:

The point was not the routing, but the fact that the supplied route produces an error in the MCDU when I try to load it.  The vagaries of the route aren't really relevant, I could have gone via Tahiti for all it mattered.

Sure if all points were connected, but they are not and therefore an MCDU error, and in this case a CTD. CTD shouldn't happen, but the plan is still faulty.

Yes. Should NOT. I trying to get this kind of crash on my side but sadly - without luck.

272

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Wangenheim wrote:

Hello,

I'm still received CTD on entering CRZ/TEMP.
Steps:
1. GPU = ON
2. Batteries = ON
3. GPU B Avail = ON
4. FMGS - Init
5. FMGS - Plan = LKPR/UMMS, R1, NON (without plan generation)
6. FMGS - Flight Number = CSA615
7. FMGS - Align IRS
8. FMGS - CRZ/TEMP = 410/-48 ===> CTD

A330 V3B5, XP11.11

is this is stable crash and you get it if do the same again?

273

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Wangenheim wrote:

Hello,

I'm still received CTD on entering CRZ/TEMP.
Steps:
1. GPU = ON
2. Batteries = ON
3. GPU B Avail = ON
4. FMGS - Init
5. FMGS - Plan = LKPR/UMMS, R1, NON (without plan generation)
6. FMGS - Flight Number = CSA615
7. FMGS - Align IRS
8. FMGS - CRZ/TEMP = 410/-48 ===> CTD

A330 V3B5, XP11.11

Ok, I get it and fix. Thanks for info!

274

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Peter092 wrote:

Hello,

again and sorry to show you perhaps a new problem: sometimes the spoliers do not work.

In this video, I do a flight training "take-off loops" LFPO RWY20 - LFPO ILS06.

You may find that the spoiler lever operates in manual and landing but the spoilers do not come out.

Other theft, they work.

Here is the video : https://drive.google.com/file/d/141BjhN … sp=sharing

NB:
Starting runningFlight engines LFPO-LFPO
AIRAC: 1801 - January 2018.
Starting runningX-plane engines 11.10
Windows 10
Plugins, Skymax Pro only.

Thank you for your attention. Best regards.
Peter (in French)


It may not work in replay mode, but check this during flight, please.

275 (edited by Peter092 2018-02-22 06:58:28)

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

ilankrt wrote:

jcdp  I really appreciate your patience and relax !  When I read all error messages and complaints in the last time I lose patience very quickly. Even in this case, after the obvious large number of errors that were made, it is obvious  that the take-off must gone badly. I also made a short video about the same flight and - oh my... - everything went as usual. But even if you offer videos for training  (that means a lot of effort) in the end hardly anyone is interested. It is easier to ask than working yourself up the matter ....     https://youtu.be/APoMBzdwoSM

Stay calm and relax ilankrt. You lose patience very quickly because your demo video is wrong.

1 / in the flight plan given by the MCDU from A330 to Waypoint BM the recommended speed is = 250 Kts (see below).

At BM, I'm accelerating to 190 kts because I follow the flight plan of the MCDU of the A330 of Jar Design (look pictures).

http://i.imgur.com/5ay2A32.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/fu2fYp6.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/J2jndr3.jpg

------------------------------------------

2 / in your video the driver at waypoint BM is at 150kts stabilized (150 kts is below V2 + 10).  it is sure that it will not happen  !!! (see capture) And, the video does not respect the flight plan or maybe the flight plan has been changed ... But it is not in the video! Easy (look capture)

http://i.imgur.com/GOEhNzo.jpg

Stay calm ilankrt and check your sources.