[ Closed ] ver 2.6 beta 4 WIN/MAC 64 bit (Page 5 of 9)

Nope, doesn't work here, either. Can confirm that CI works on 2.5b1 (05.09.2015)

What kind of fix do you expect?
That one can enter numbers 0 <= Ci <= 999 or that the CI gets considered?

is landing gear and landing gear lever (both!) down?
are all systems pressurised? not sure, but that's may be needed.

In fact in v2.5 CI is working fine, in that it makes clb, crz and des speeds properly vary. Better if now it could be 0-999 range, but first it'd have to work

Changing CRZ FL in climb on PROG page, adduct aircraft to lost lateral path - aircraft begin uncontrolled turn to the left and reach previous point in FP.

Solution : set HDG and maintain lateral path - DIR-TO to required intersection - set managed mode LNAV.

Hello, thank you all for nice work.
I’ve found a couple of ‘bugs’ trying to test approaches with DME-arcs. (Navigraph AIRAC 1601)
My test is with VOR APP to RWY 08 in GCTS (Tenerife Sur Airport) using STAR KONBA4G.
VOR RWY 08 has two VIAS, IAF BAMEL and IAF TFS, if you select NO STAR, you can choose the two VIAS plus the NO VIA option that takes you directly to FAF TFS

Selecting VIA BAMEL draws wrong the course intersection CI129 to the DME ARC

But if you select STAR KONBA4G, you have no option at all to select VIA BAMEL

STAR KONBA4G goes VIA ARACO GANTO BAMEL(IAF) AND TFS(IAF), so it should be able to select Approach VIA BAMEL, and then ending STAR at BAMEL, not TFS

All this with ver 2.6 beta 4, WINDOWS 7 X64, X-PLANE 10.42

I would also like to bring attention to the bug reported here http://jardesign.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=1583
Although I know is not Beta related.

Thank you so much for such nice work and product.

Salute!

Logo light is in if Nav/Logo light switch is set to 1 or 2 and flaps/ slats are extended more then 15 degrees or if gear is compressed.

So very well moddled in the jar Airbus.

I agree, I don't understand how these bugs take SO long to work through.  It feels so close but either the code is such a mess it can't be figured out or it's just a very low priority.  This is the perception, not necessarily the reality.  That said, I've heard similar comments about FF and their 757.  The JAR planes are still fun to fly and you can simply pretend they have many built in failures you have to work through as PIC.

It's unbelievable. We had to wait for years to get anything and
I'm really happy about guys like JAR.
It's very difficult to find enough information about the aircraft.
You need to have a very high capability of coding and 3D modelling.
And last but not least, the developers normally are simple guys, having a normal full time job and possibly family.
Many thanks that developers like you exist and help us to enjoy our passion better and better.

I started with XP10 and the CRJ. Now I know the difference between the game (aircraft is a point of mass having no moments) FSX/P3D and a simulator (body with 6 degree of freedom and distribution of aerodynamic forces) X-Plane and love it to fly Airbusses.

The FF A350 was published in December 2014 and does still not supply any understanding of SID/STAR.

exactly..  I appreciate JARs work like the rest of you but I wish they would hold off on new projects until the A320 feels way more more complete. I heard the A330 version is better than the A320.. wasn't the the A320 started first? We don't even have the follow me car back...

One thing at a time.. Flight factors new 767 maybe my plane of choice to fly very soon.. hearing nothing but rave reviews. Not taking the chance on buying Jars A330 after the A320 wait.

Good day,
speedbird0327,gpb500, galaio.silva As a vet I served in the US Navy to make sure the world has the rights to speak their mind and never be oppressed for doing so, and you have been able to do just that on this forum.
Now i would like my turn, i do not know how old you are so, I will keep things simple.
if you have an issue with the aircraft you must send a log.txt and a bbox.txt to receive any tech support with out those two items you cannot expect to receive help.
then when you want to start to complain about one of the x-Plane developers that I know for a fact because I am a coder also has code and the knowledge to make some of the best aircraft in the X-Plane Hangers.
As, a beta tester and Apple Developer I can tell you that if you were to post you log.txt and bbox.txt you would have gotten as much help as needed to resolve you issue instead of being upset.
now if you want me to help I will but you need to post the items I mentioned above.
your friend,
captbullett

Hi !

I'm just started trying ATC (or x-life) on A320, and I could not move the main ATC window more to the right....

As I have a 3 monitor setup, I can't read the beginning of all messages in the standard ATC window.

On other planes, the ATC window is quite well positioned.

A320:

Chessna 172:

How can I move the window more to the right ??
Or is this hardcoded and plane-dependant ?

best regards,