51 Reply by AUA1377 (edited by AUA1377 2015-12-24 09:06:49)

  • AUA1377
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-09-01
  • Posts: 13

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

Hi JAR,

I did/tried a flight from ULMM to LOWW and found some very annoying bugs, please fix them...

Flight: ULMM-LOWW
Route: PELOR DCT KELEK DCT RENVI M857 TLL L729 LUTAL P870 BOKSU M985 EVINA N744 TUSIN DCT MIKOV
AIRAC: 1512 Navigraph
Windows 8.1 + XP 10.42

ULMM
DEP RWY: 13
DEP SID: PELOR1

http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/1278/t/p1a79j47ailnd1rca11m715nckjl3.jpg


First bug, wrong route drawing, why is it not out rwy heading and direct to PELOR after the turn?

http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/1278/t/p1a79j4unvvg51ju61u0m1gus18ra5.jpg
http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/1278/t/p1a79j5viutgf6e81t8all2oo37.jpg

From Jeppesen chart ULMM (http://www.uvairlines.com/admin/resourc … s/ULMM.pdf):
http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/1278/t/p1a79jprdqutdvgu1ho549v19un3.jpg


Second bug, after taking off I got a few terrain warnings, I also had that with beta 1 and 2 at other airports, seems to be a main problem. (It happens very often after takeoff - but there should be no terrain warning)

http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/1278/t/p1a79jb6ila7h1sui1ruj1l661219.jpg

Then, the aircraft followed the (incorrect drawn) route path.

http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/1278/t/p1a79jckh0p80trt1uvulnc1sj1b.jpg


But then, and this is the third bug, I inserted a direct to RENVI. The aircraft started turning to the left without any reason. It turned, turned, turned and stopped turning and heading a completely wrong direction. There was no chance to get back on the route, not by inserting further directs, not by pulling and again pressing the heading knob, not by disengaging and reactivating the autopilot - no chance! I had to cancel the flight... :-(

http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/1278/t/p1a79jh1071gb91e0tj5m1rvfp27d.jpg
http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/1278/t/p1a79jhadk16q1uthsgj5k1p07f.jpg
http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/1278/t/p1a79jht5jboa1tjjtmdg061r7nj.jpg

Thanks for fixing these bugs!
Merry Christmas!

Post's attachments

Attachment icon bbox_log.txt 4.55 kb, 314 downloads since 2015-12-24 

52 Reply by zippy77777

  • zippy77777
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-02-20
  • Posts: 96

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

thomas_99 wrote:

Hi !

Another nice and annoying bug:

1) start xplane & load A320 2.6 B3

2) Press "Hot Start"

3) Click on MCDU "PERF" Page

4) Click "Page up"


Result:

It won't stop clicking :-)

click click click click click.... :-)

best regards,


yep, that certainly does drive you mad!!

Intel i5 3570K, Gigabyte G1 Gaming GTX 970 4GB, 16GB Ram

53 Reply by zippy77777

  • zippy77777
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-02-20
  • Posts: 96

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

At least we know why it does it. Merry Xmas to everyone and especially to JAR. Thank you for all your hard work :-)

Intel i5 3570K, Gigabyte G1 Gaming GTX 970 4GB, 16GB Ram

54 Reply by captbullett

  • captbullett
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-04-08
  • Posts: 975

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

Good day,

The next step is to contact BSS then and see what they have to say this is what i experienced and only two days into using the sound I removed it after no response from the developer and just stopped using BSS and never had anymore issues now BSS is working on several projects on the sound so he knows what he is doing we just need to document the issue !
Brian


hades.esp72 wrote:

Me too. I confirm that only happen with BSS.

thomas_99 wrote:

Hi !

Hmm, I deleted the BSS installation, and now I don't have click sounds at all (at the fmc) ....


captbullett wrote:

Good day,

well Now that I have seen two of you with the same issue could one of you try to uninstall BSS and see if it goes away and I am sorry I had an chip !
happy Holidays
B

55 Reply by james90909

  • james90909
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-08-23
  • Posts: 23

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

nothing ever seems to progress with this issue :

the green line to the next waypoint on the ND should be dead centered with or without a crosswind element it makes no difference the next waypoint is always exactly at the 12 o clock position on the ND - even with a 100 mph 90 degree crosswind the green line should still be centered the only thing that moves is the green diamond to show the difference between track and the heading of the aircrafts nose

this issue is on the A330 as well.

Post's attachments

Attachment icon Screen Shot 2015-12-24 at 10.52.33 PM.png 142.63 kb, 179 downloads since 2015-12-25 

56 Reply by crisk73

  • crisk73
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-06-02
  • Posts: 31

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

Hi Jar, thank you for doing souch a good job, please among the other things provide a fix for those annoying flickering ailerons that used to work flawlessly before r2.5.
Merry X-mas & happy New Year!!! smile

57 Reply by hades.esp72

  • hades.esp72
  • Member
  • Offline
  • From: Spain
  • Registered: 2015-08-05
  • Posts: 65

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

Good afternoon.

It would be very interesting to add one more digit to the radio frequencies; Example: 135.145.

Thanks.

58 Reply by coldsteel

  • coldsteel
  • New member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-12-28
  • Posts: 2

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

Hi,

Great plane one of my favourites. Is there any chance you can change the checklist on the A320 Neo to resemble the A330 checklist that is a lot more user friendly.

Cheers

59 Reply by J.A.Romanov

  • J.A.Romanov
  • J.A.Romanov
  • Admin
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-02-15
  • Posts: 2,885

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

james90909 wrote:

nothing ever seems to progress with this issue :

the green line to the next waypoint on the ND should be dead centered with or without a crosswind element it makes no difference the next waypoint is always exactly at the 12 o clock position on the ND - even with a 100 mph 90 degree crosswind the green line should still be centered the only thing that moves is the green diamond to show the difference between track and the heading of the aircrafts nose

this issue is on the A330 as well.

fixed for beta 4

Please read a FAQ before you post a bug http://support.jardesign.org

60 Reply by J.A.Romanov

  • J.A.Romanov
  • J.A.Romanov
  • Admin
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-02-15
  • Posts: 2,885

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

thomas_99 wrote:

Hi !

Another nice and annoying bug:

1) start xplane & load A320 2.6 B3

2) Press "Hot Start"

3) Click on MCDU "PERF" Page

4) Click "Page up"


Result:

It won't stop clicking :-)

click click click click click.... :-)

best regards,

fixed for beta 4

Please read a FAQ before you post a bug http://support.jardesign.org

61 Reply by J.A.Romanov

  • J.A.Romanov
  • J.A.Romanov
  • Admin
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-02-15
  • Posts: 2,885

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

We (mostly an a320 pilots, who test our model) tune flightmodel to make it some more close to real (for their experience) at takeoff and landing. Before posting beta 4, i will compare this new tune with Thalles FFS simulator. Hope will fly FFS today.

Please read a FAQ before you post a bug http://support.jardesign.org

62 Reply by J.A.Romanov

  • J.A.Romanov
  • J.A.Romanov
  • Admin
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-02-15
  • Posts: 2,885

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

zippy77777 wrote:

No retard calls?

I have, just check it.

Please read a FAQ before you post a bug http://support.jardesign.org

63 Reply by hades.esp72

  • hades.esp72
  • Member
  • Offline
  • From: Spain
  • Registered: 2015-08-05
  • Posts: 65

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

I have too...

J.A.Romanov wrote:
zippy77777 wrote:

No retard calls?

I have, just check it.

64 Reply by galaio.silva

  • galaio.silva
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-05-26
  • Posts: 11

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

Hello. I'm interest to know if the things reported on post 51 will be corrected for next beta. Especially this issue:

quote:

"But then, and this is the third bug, I inserted a direct to RENVI. The aircraft started turning to the left without any reason. It turned, turned, turned and stopped turning and heading a completely wrong direction. There was no chance to get back on the route, not by inserting further directs, not by pulling and again pressing the heading knob, not by disengaging and reactivating the autopilot - no chance! I had to cancel the flight... :-("

I already see this kind of bug almost from the time i bought this addon, and it was almost two years ago smile. The plane doesn't like to suffer some changes on flight plan during flight phase.

Kind Regards.

65 Reply by gpb500

  • gpb500
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-09-13
  • Posts: 25

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

KPHX/KPSP RNAV Y 13R approach into PSP gave me WASAK (IF) as the final before 13R (not even lined up with the runway).  There are four additional fixes between WASAK and 13R and so I added JEXOT in order to establish an aligned approach.  What that did instead of creating a linked route was created a second branch off of WASAK.  So what appeared in the ND was WASAK connected to JEXOT and WASAK connected to 13R.  I know this used to work...might be worth testing for beta 4.

66 Reply by amischkowitz

  • amischkowitz
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-08-06
  • Posts: 192

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

Good Evening,

For my flights I use the software PFPX to plan them

Is it possible to have more accurate possibilities according the fuel to be closer to the reality (cf. flight plan)

For example :
Flight EHAM -LFML

Release EHAM : 5 967 kgs for 2h:58
Actually it is only possible to have 5 or 6 tonnes (lack of accuracy for the fuel quantity)

Thanks a lot in advance

67 Reply by J.A.Romanov

  • J.A.Romanov
  • J.A.Romanov
  • Admin
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-02-15
  • Posts: 2,885

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

amischkowitz wrote:

Good Evening,

For my flights I use the software PFPX to plan them

Is it possible to have more accurate possibilities according the fuel to be closer to the reality (cf. flight plan)

For example :
Flight EHAM -LFML

Release EHAM : 5 967 kgs for 2h:58
Actually it is only possible to have 5 or 6 tonnes (lack of accuracy for the fuel quantity)

Thanks a lot in advance

Are you resave aircraft with PlaneMaker?

Please read a FAQ before you post a bug http://support.jardesign.org

68 Reply by amischkowitz

  • amischkowitz
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-08-06
  • Posts: 192

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

amischkowitz wrote:

    Good Evening,

    For my flights I use the software PFPX to plan them

    Is it possible to have more accurate possibilities according the fuel to be closer to the reality (cf. flight plan)

    For example :
    Flight EHAM -LFML

    Release EHAM : 5 967 kgs for 2h:58
    Actually it is only possible to have 5 or 6 tonnes (lack of accuracy for the fuel quantity)

    Thanks a lot in advance

Are you resave aircraft with PlaneMaker?


Hi,

No, at all. I just use the aircraft as it is.

Thanks a lot

69 Reply by petitmarseillais

  • petitmarseillais
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-08-23
  • Posts: 18

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

Hello,
Two things for mcdu
First direct mode doesn t work. it doesn t follow right heading.
Second thing i am not sure that it s issue from plane but arrival from tinot for lfkj put some fix for lfkb.
For second point i have to check with boeing from ff using same airac data

Kind regards

70 Reply by amischkowitz

  • amischkowitz
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-08-06
  • Posts: 192

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

Flight from EHAM to LFML
SID : LOPI 2 S
STAR : BALS8B VIA TRANS AVN for landing ILS LFML 13L Z

At approach descent from more than 6000 feet /min and STAR broken see photos


Thanks a lot for your help

71 Reply by amischkowitz

  • amischkowitz
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-08-06
  • Posts: 192

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

sorry for the photo
http://jardesign.org/forum/img/m/1125/t/p1a7ptuj9g1sl016h31vg2hdses73.jpg

72 Reply by petitmarseillais

  • petitmarseillais
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-08-23
  • Posts: 18

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

I know perfectly arrival and approach at lfml.
lerga fl290
avn fl080 speed restriction 220 kt
zebra 4000 ft
i dont understand why fix fd300avn ???!!!

73 Reply by AUA1377 (edited by AUA1377 2015-12-30 21:08:20)

  • AUA1377
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-09-01
  • Posts: 13

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

amischkowitz wrote:

At approach descent from more than 6000 feet /min

Can confirm this bug, not only at this STAR. Already had it from time to time. My "workaround" was to use OP DES mode instead, but thats not the solution (and not realistic) - please fix that, thanks!

74 Reply by kyuui13

  • kyuui13
  • Member
  • Offline
  • From: Tucson, Az
  • Registered: 2015-08-01
  • Posts: 57

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

One thing I noticed with the latest is window reflections, as a personal preference, I dislike static ones, is there an easy way to remove  it?  Its very distracting at times since it doesn't change and shows up when reflections wouldn't generally as well.

75 Reply by amischkowitz

  • amischkowitz
  • Member
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2015-08-06
  • Posts: 192

Re: ver 2.6 beta 3 WIN/MAC 64 bit

Yesterday 23:03:09

    Member
    Offline

    Registered: 2015-08-23
    Posts: 12

I know perfectly arrival and approach at lfml.
lerga fl290
avn fl080 speed restriction 220 kt
zebra 4000 ft
i dont understand why fix fd300avn ???!!!


Hi Petitmarseillais,

Why Fix FD 300 AVN ?

I don't know.

Flightplan was made with the PFPX software with realistic runway at departure and arrival (I called the ATIS service at Marseille Provence) and then entered the flight plan in the MCDU.

But sometimes I had bug with STAR or SID (curves that does not exist in reality procedures or broken STAR)

Please Mr Romanov fix this and also allow to enter speed restrictions on the MCDU

A lot of thanks in adavance