Did a flight from EDDV to EDDS according to JARDesign flight school tutorial, this time under stormy weather conditions. It was interesting, as you would say in England.
Stability on ground was okay, also during takeoff run - I still have the feeling that I have a better grip on the runway under stormy conditions with the 2.4 than with the 2.3. Version. But still - electronic Noise from the Stick is an issue.
Once in flight things got ... ehm, let me say, extremly shaky ... According to my opinion, the flight model of the A320 still seems pretty vulnerable to bad weather conditions - with sidewinds and windsheers pressing you up to 30 degrees, in some cases even up to 40 degrees bank ... May be a Real life Pilot could tell better if such reactions to turbulences are realistic... (Needed a Vodka after that flight.)
Transitions were displayed in Vias, but worked so far. Last point of flight plan was LBU with the following MCDU FPLAN Approach route "Runway 25/no star / LBU25 Transition". On first glance, their arrangement looked logic and followed Transition Pattern of EDDS. So nothing to complain currently, except that the transition was displayed in via.
Vertical descent profile was pretty nice and stable due to transitional approach. Haven´t to report any issues here.
One Bug I recognized - you can set auto break to MAX during flight. Should not be possible in A320.
Landing: to be true - since weather effects seemed to multiply during approach, a stable, ILS-Approach was not possible, ending in AP Disconnect and Go-Around. What could be observed was that Weather effects on plane multiplied with passenger tossed through cabin, due to bank.
Last thing - I checked out some Barometer Values at four or five german airports. QNH-based Altitude-calculation looked more precise in V2.4 than in the 2.3. Deviations in 2.4 ranged between 20 and 40 feet, compared to published airport elevation. Yet - if somebody wants to be extremly precise and stick to official regulations, a deviation of 40 feet compared to charts would still be too much.