[ Closed ] ver 2.4 beta 1 WIN/MAC 64 bit (Page 2 of 3)

log is clear.. So are you have 2.3r4 work well (with sound)?

with 2.4b1 There is no engine sound and no flight attendant sound for me. after many of x-plane reloads. And the 2.3r4 works perfect!

Edit: There is no warning sound, Autopilot disconnect etc. Also is very strange that the aircraft climbing with +5000 - +6000 vs fully loaded with packs and cargo and fuel.

aileron is shaking / shuddering in flight all the time ..

Same here with me.. aircraft is doing fine after a few initial CTDs but theres no engine sound, and no fire test sounds. All other sounds works fine (knobs, coo pilot voice etc)... here my log.txt

Win 8.1 64bit

Sound is back.. thanks!

engines running but elevator not move

pitch roll does't work engines running hydraulic is ok and joystick setting ok
ps i have 2.4B2

i have no sound problem only pitch and roll problem. what i must do now?

You must wait ...
Eugeny is thinking.

Dieter

Ok, as I understand 90% windows users have no sounds with beta 1. Thats not good, but need wait solution from SASL developers. What to do? Wait, please, no more. Or, sure, if possible to test flight model without sounds - please do it.

Okay, Gentlemen, got it working so far after renaming the A320JARDesign-Folder to "A320neo_2.4". That solved the SASL-too short of memory-troubles. Okay, I had no sound, but that did not mind anyway, since I was curious concerning flight controls and their performance.

Since I am pretty short of time I just made a testflight at EDDP, with a short climb to FL110 and return back to the airport. Weather conditions were CAVOK. So I can´t say very much about wind impact.

In Contrast to A320, Version 2.3, the Hot Start function of Version 2.4 worked reliable this time, just lacking speed announcement during take-off-run.

Performance of the aircraft during taxi-out was pretty much more realistic and being closer to the operational limits of A320 (at least the ones I know from Stationary Simulators) By first impression, I would say that taxi-performances respects pretty much the the limitations outlined in FCOMs, with speed restrictions required during turning and taxi.

Thrust modelation during take off also looked pretty much okay to me - Version 2.4 is not so heavy on acceleration during take off run than the Version 2.3, Consequently, it is pretty much closer to the a320-originals I encountered during flights and my hours in the sim.

One of the things I encountered during flight, is that the FBW of the A320 heavy on stability. I guess most of the guys here will have their fun with it, since it makes landing pretty much easy and comfortable, including keeping up with vectors and speeds. The flight models of the A320 I encountered in sim were not that heavy on stability, requiring regular re-adjustment even with Auto-Trim. But I guess with some fine tuning of joystick, you should get it working similar to a sim or the original.

As a resumee concerning the fbw, I have to say - in flight the 2.4-model performed under under CAVOK/NOSIG conditions nice and very stable.

The FBW and MCDU FPLAN Approaches I will test out later, when I have more time.

So far so good, the fbw looks nice so far. I like it.