You are not logged in. Please login or register.
JARDesign Group Board → Beta-versions (Download & Discussions) → v.3.1 beta 1, 2, 3 public beta-tests
GLASSMANUALCONTROL is not dataref, but variable. I was not initialized before and this is not 100% correct, but infact this script will work without error, cause just determinate it value like 0.
This is absolutely amazing and I've had no issues so far, installed perfectly!
Though I wish she would stop messing with the smoking and seatbelt signs automatically, fighting with her through the climbout to keep them on! lol.
Will she be able to land the plane one day? 
Brilliant again.
For all who want to teach something how to fly with real A330 or A340 i'll find on net this Training pilots and copilots manual.
http://www.smartcockpit.com/docs/A330-A … Manual.pdf
I wish you a nice flying with JAR A330 with copilot and in future with A340.
For all who want to teach something how to fly with real A330 or A340 i'll find on net this Training pilots and copilots manual.
http://www.smartcockpit.com/docs/A330-A … Manual.pdf
I wish you a nice flying with JAR A330 with copilot and in future with A340.
Nice one! Thank you.
I did 2 test flights. There is one thing i noticed:
In the landing checklist when "Auto brake low" is selected, i don't need to confirm the brake setting. She just says:
- "Auto brake"
- "E CAM Status"
- i respond "No blue"
- ...
Shouldn't i need to respond with "low"?
This happenend to me twice. Did someone else notice the same?
[EDIT]
I think i found the error. In "plugins\copilot_main\custom\execute\checklist\Landing.txt" there is one incorrect "endif"
if:sim/custom/xap/brakes/auto_med==1
waitanswer:ANY
waitanswer:Medium
endif: <------------------------------------------- Remove!
elseif:sim/custom/xap/brakes/auto_lo==1
waitanswer:ANY
waitanswer:Low
endif:
I did 2 test flights. There is one thing i noticed:
In the landing checklist when "Auto brake low" is selected, i don't need to confirm the brake setting. She just says:
- "Auto brake"
- "E CAM Status"
- i respond "No blue"
- ...Shouldn't i need to respond with "low"?
This happenend to me twice. Did someone else notice the same?
[EDIT]
I think i found the error. In "plugins\copilot_main\custom\execute\checklist\Landing.txt" there is one incorrect "endif"if:sim/custom/xap/brakes/auto_med==1
waitanswer:ANY
waitanswer:Medium
endif: <------------------------------------------- Remove!elseif:sim/custom/xap/brakes/auto_lo==1
waitanswer:ANY
waitanswer:Low
endif:
NO BLUE...
I tested the change today and now the landing checklist works correctly.
"Auto brake" - "low" - "ECAM memo" - "No blue" - ...
NO BLUE...
?
Not sure what you mean.
GeorgyPilot330 wrote:Hi another time! I try to make speech recognition like in the pictures that are published by you higher, but look, I have problem: I can't click on most of windows(((Can you help me? My language is Russian
ну конечно - наберите мне на скай j.a.romanov - поразбираемся что там не получилось
Не могу по скайпу, есть ли другие варианты? ВК?
I did 2 test flights. There is one thing i noticed:
In the landing checklist when "Auto brake low" is selected, i don't need to confirm the brake setting. She just says:
- "Auto brake"
- "E CAM Status"
- i respond "No blue"
- ...Shouldn't i need to respond with "low"?
This happenend to me twice. Did someone else notice the same?
[EDIT]
I think i found the error. In "plugins\copilot_main\custom\execute\checklist\Landing.txt" there is one incorrect "endif"if:sim/custom/xap/brakes/auto_med==1
waitanswer:ANY
waitanswer:Medium
endif: <------------------------------------------- Remove!elseif:sim/custom/xap/brakes/auto_lo==1
waitanswer:ANY
waitanswer:Low
endif:
Thanks! Will check!
J.A.Romanov wrote:GeorgyPilot330 wrote:Hi another time! I try to make speech recognition like in the pictures that are published by you higher, but look, I have problem: I can't click on most of windows(((Can you help me? My language is Russian
ну конечно - наберите мне на скай j.a.romanov - поразбираемся что там не получилось
Не могу по скайпу, есть ли другие варианты? ВК?
This is absolutely amazing and I've had no issues so far, installed perfectly!
Though I wish she would stop messing with the smoking and seatbelt signs automatically, fighting with her through the climbout to keep them on! lol.
Will she be able to land the plane one day?
Thanks!
Hi
Up to now I made flights with ILS landing … without any difficulty .
I decided to change using RNAV approach and doing so I noticed that copilot activated "LS" … ? why . this type of approach only uses satellites and no equipment on ground .
So I deactivated "LS" and activated "APPR" only … and even arriving with the correct mandatory altitude the aircraft is not guided to the runway …
Does that happen only to me ?
Thanks for help .
jcdp
Co-Pilot working nicely here. I can confirm that flight control check checklist gets stuck before rudder pedals check. I got around to it by skipping it, to avoid a continuous loop on subsequent checklists. The response time can be shortened but not a big deal for testing.
PS: does this Beta work with BSS sound pack?
Hi
Up to now I made flights with ILS landing … without any difficulty .
I decided to change using RNAV approach and doing so I noticed that copilot activated "LS" … ? why . this type of approach only uses satellites and no equipment on ground .
So I deactivated "LS" and activated "APPR" only … and even arriving with the correct mandatory altitude the aircraft is not guided to the runway …
Does that happen only to me ?
Thanks for help .
jcdp
I think that RNAV is only a flight and approach (or departure) system and finally linked to an ILS landing system for an autoland. RNAV only dont land, it need an ILS for put the plane at ground.
jcdp wrote:Hi
Up to now I made flights with ILS landing … without any difficulty .
I decided to change using RNAV approach and doing so I noticed that copilot activated "LS" … ? why . this type of approach only uses satellites and no equipment on ground .
So I deactivated "LS" and activated "APPR" only … and even arriving with the correct mandatory altitude the aircraft is not guided to the runway …
Does that happen only to me ?
Thanks for help .
jcdp
I think that RNAV is only a flight and approach (or departure) system and finally linked to an ILS landing system for an autoland. RNAV only dont land, it need an ILS for put the plane at ground.
Hi
Thanks for your answer
But now RNAV landing replaces more and more ILS landing . Main reason is "less expensive cost for installation and maintenance" than ILS equipment on ground …
This is a quite different landing possibility than ILS
See : https://www.quora.com/What-is-an-RNAV-a … S-approach
That is near future
It only uses satellites , nothing on ground …
And this is also the reason of my comment about A330 beta with copilot . (RNAV landing works fine with version without copilot) .
jcdp
I just completed my first flight with Lynda and overall I'm very impressed, I will post something to the FB page later.
I found the set up to be very easy, just two buttons needed to make it work.
I would suggest that you recommend users to have a printed .PDF file with all commands and responses. I have a one sheet Airbus checklist and this made it very easy to issue commands and to predict the responses.
Small issues:
1. The read-back got stuck in a loop repeating commands in two checklists, after start and before take off. I don't know why but it exited the loop after a few annoying minutes. :-) NOTE: THE LOOP HAPPENS BECAUSE THE F/O NEVER COMPLETES THE FLIGHT CONTROL CHECK. THERE WAS NO RUDDER CHECK....
2. I found the read-back text hard to read. Perhaps this could be put in a window or have a different colour background.
3. There's quite a delay between issuing a command and a response. This makes it seem like the command hasn't been heard when it had.
4. I did load the aircraft into 11.30 Beta afterwards just too see. The manipulators are not working properly, for example it was not possible to put the IRS's into NAV mode.
Great work guys though, this shows huge promise!
Kindest regards, Chris
Chris, there is a small omission of "endif" in the \execute\checklist\FlightControl.txt. The rudder pedals will be checked after adding a second endif at the bottom of that file, making the end look like below
say:Flight Control Check Completed
var:isFlightControlCheck=1
pos:ok
wait:2
endif:
endif:
Approach checklist never seems to be able to complete? She always says baro reference is not set, tried it as Standard, QNH and inHG, never seems to accept. Although, this may be another issue but the MCDU does not always seem to follow crossing restrictions, even when entered Vert Rev page, not sure why.
478/5000
Greetings to all, I just want to say something to the team of JarDesign, I'm super happy with the Copilot, it's a marvel, but if I wanted to give you a suggestion, in the commands allow the CHECK command, as the copilot executes a checklist, one can go saying CHECK, as it is in real life, that both the captain and the co-pilot check each other in all procedures and processes of a flight, this would give even more realism to the copilot, thanks
has anyone experienced an X-Plane A330 crash during flight with version 11.30b5 or 11.30b6 (Win or Mac) ?
Approach checklist never seems to be able to complete? She always says baro reference is not set, tried it as Standard, QNH and inHG, never seems to accept.
I had the same issue on some of my flights.
I think it happens because the Co-pilot will check the inHg value and not the hPa (QNH) value. There is no 1:1 ratio between inHg and hPa. So it can happen that when you select a QNH of 1007 it can mean either 29.75, 29.76 or 29.77. If you select QNH 1007 and X-plane(?) sets it internally equal to 29.76 but the co-pilot expects 29.75, you cannot complete the approach checklist. Last flight i checked the exact inHg value and it worked fine.
Another problem:
During flight control check it will not detect the neutral position of the ailerons. Don't know why...:/
Does anyone else have this issue?
Approach checklist never seems to be able to complete? She always says baro reference is not set, tried it as Standard, QNH and inHG, never seems to accept. Although, this may be another issue but the MCDU does not always seem to follow crossing restrictions, even when entered Vert Rev page, not sure why.
I have no problem in my configuration with Approach checklist, and I play every day flights. I fly every time with real weather, set QNH as required by ATC on transition level and Approach checklist accept them. Do you play with real weather or you manually set weather, there could be problem to input the right QNH?
I'll make circle fly over Europe with A330 beta3 with copilot without any errors. 
Pictures from LittleNavmap tracking.
I'll enjoyed flying with copilot, with which the fly moves closer to the real feeling of sitting in the cabin and aid the co-pilot.
Thanks again for this products.
At the end I'll fell in love to LINDA
Thanks again for this products.
At the end I'll fell in love to LINDA
SAME !!
Will there be a way to disable it for people that use smartcopilot and fly with other real humans?
Hello,
I use WIN7 Prof in German. Unfortunately a voice control of the A330 is not possible. An error is displayed. Does the voice control of the A330 only work under Win10 ? Or is there a possibility with Win7 Prof ? Win7 Prof does not support English voice control only starting from Win7 ultimate
best regards
Udo
JARDesign Group Board → Beta-versions (Download & Discussions) → v.3.1 beta 1, 2, 3 public beta-tests
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.