[ Closed ] v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests (Page 9 of 13)

**ilankrt** · 2018-02-16 23:01:53

ilankrt
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-10-20
Posts: 774

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

MrGeeBee wrote:

Pretty good flight, bad ending. Not sure what's happening. If it's me or something else.
Constructive feedback please.
https://youtu.be/pmYL59aZ188?t=7737

Too bad that you did not enlarge the route. It is difficult to see clear the ND. But I recognise at 02.14.41 that you ar flying toward PISAS at FL 5000ft too high to catch LOC or G/S. Then I see that the turn at OM23 is far too narrow for straightened with the runway.

I didn't follow the whole video and don't know about the flightplan, but I think that I had added at least on or more additional FIXes before OM23 to have a less sharp turn to RWY. Adding FIXes can be handled through the A330 MCDU. Or as I now see delete LBV and you solve you problem.

BTW I see now that you didn't activated the APPR probably on time. It initiate the speed reduce and descent to G/S.....

**ilankrt** · 2018-02-16 23:31:27

ilankrt
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-10-20
Posts: 774

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Test flight A330 v.B4 using XL: All systems are working well. No special occurrences. This time I waned to see how aircraft behaves under stormy weather conditions, so I turned off real weather conditions and configured manually a stormy weather.

At 88kt tailwinds entering storm clouds aircraft lost the AP ability to hold flight route. Then AP disconnected several times and aircraft seems to roll over. flying manually through kicking the rudder helped to level aircraft but I couldn't"t hold flight route any more. Having now 77kt sidewinds I had to reduce speed and get the right FL - too much for one pilot ....

At least at 105kt (!) tailwinds I reached 10000ft and began with the approach. The imported thing is that the aircraft model stayed full functioning all the time through..... though this behaviour there was no way to land. Back to real weather conditions and Go-Around (flight path was not correct this time) manually back on G/S I land safely...

Post's attachments

24.jpeg 1.19 mb, 433 downloads since 2018-02-16

24.jpeg 1.19 mb, 387 downloads since 2018-02-16

25.jpeg 1.23 mb, 394 downloads since 2018-02-16

26.jpeg 1.4 mb, 409 downloads since 2018-02-16

27.jpeg 1.33 mb, 428 downloads since 2018-02-16

**thomas_99** · 2018-02-17 18:25:55

thomas_99
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-05-04
Posts: 235

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Hi !

Crash / CTD while entering flight plan departure from eddl:

Flight Plan:

EDDL SID KUMIK Y854 BOMBI T721 LAMGO T721 SUL T732 GARMO STAR EDNY

Cycle 1603

[SASL INFO] "bbox"
[SASL INFO] "bbox" >>> zulu 13:55:26
[SASL INFO] "bbox"    baro alt=137 / rad alt=1
[SASL INFO] "bbox"    air spd=0 / gnd spd=0 / mach=0
[SASL INFO] "bbox"    GW=175065 / FOB=9869 / CG=28
[SASL INFO] "bbox" vert wait = ALT
FMGS: 173 : Add points: 1
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,CA,0,52.0,2,600,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,DF,DL050,51.331608,6.861822,0, ,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,DL058,51.354350,6.912764,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,BAM,51.327758,7.176983,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,ANAVI,51.311964,7.388458,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,DEGOM,51.164208,7.673856,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,2,15000,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,KUMIK,50.836586,8.073325,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : Add points: 8
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,CA,0,52.0,2,600,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,DF,DL050,51.331608,6.861822,0, ,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,DL058,51.354350,6.912764,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,BAM,51.327758,7.176983,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,ANAVI,51.311964,7.388458,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,DEGOM,51.164208,7.673856,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,2,15000,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,KUMIK,50.836586,8.073325,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : Add points: 8
FMGS: 198 : JARDesign FMGS plugin ver.V3B4-140218 detect crash.
FMGS: 198 : Memory dump saved to fmgs.dmp file
FMGS: 198 : Please send this log.txt file and fmgs.dmp file (from X-Plane folder) to support@jardesign.org !

Post's attachments

fmgs.dmp 201.83 kb, 353 downloads since 2018-02-17

**ilankrt** · 2018-02-17 19:31:18

ilankrt
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-10-20
Posts: 774

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

thomas_99 wrote:

Hi !
Crash / CTD while entering flight plan departure from eddl:
Flight Plan:
EDDL SID KUMIK Y854 BOMBI T721 LAMGO T721 SUL T732 GARMO STAR EDNY
Cycle 1603 ......

What AIRAC cycle are you using? It should be

AIRAC cycle : 1802
Version : 1
Valid (from/to): 01/FEB/2018 - 28/FEB/2018

so it will be compatible to your plan-route

**MrGeeBee** · 2018-02-18 01:46:16

MrGeeBee
Member
Offline

Registered: 2017-04-14
Posts: 60

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

ilankrt wrote:

MrGeeBee wrote:
Pretty good flight, bad ending. Not sure what's happening. If it's me or something else.
Constructive feedback please.
https://youtu.be/pmYL59aZ188?t=7737

Too bad that you did not enlarge the route. It is difficult to see clear the ND. But I recognise at 02.14.41 that you ar flying toward PISAS at FL 5000ft too high to catch LOC or G/S. Then I see that the turn at OM23 is far too narrow for straightened with the runway.
I didn't follow the whole video and don't know about the flightplan, but I think that I had added at least on or more additional FIXes before OM23 to have a less sharp turn to RWY. Adding FIXes can be handled through the A330 MCDU. Or as I now see delete LBV and you solve you problem.
BTW I see now that you didn't activated the APPR probably on time. It initiate the speed reduce and descent to G/S.....

Thanks for the feedback. Yes, I should have looked at the approach better, it was way off. Fixes definitely. But if you check the start, is also where I program the MCDU, but it's still wrong. Done other flights and they work great now. So will do some more streams soon. And keep it up Jar! You are doing this great.

**Griff** · 2018-02-18 04:59:06

Griff
Member
Offline

Registered: 2017-05-27
Posts: 35

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

I too just watched the video and unfortunately, you were a victim of an "incomplete MCDU" which should have allowed you to insert the proper arrival/transition for RWY 23. Manually adding fixes appears to be the only solution at this time until JAR can at least acknowledge that the MCDU is not complete. Had you been able to properly add the transition route from LBV (or initial approach fix ELBE) it would have taken you on a course of 066 for 21.8 miles from LBV. Then a procedural turn to PISAS or a point 9.3 miles from the RWY at 3000 feet. Then, the landing would have been much easier to manage along with your altitude, speed, flaps deployment, etc during approach. Looking forward to a complete MCDU......

**Beerbog** · 2018-02-18 08:00:53

Beerbog
Member
Offline

Registered: 2018-02-09
Posts: 8

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Downloaded this morning and flew VTBS - VHHH. Great A/C, no real dramas apart from occasionally wandering off the NAV course during cruise. Love how the ND flight path is now curved, and the constraints actually work, especially altitude.

**J.A.Romanov** · 2018-02-18 08:35:09

J.A.Romanov
Admin
Offline

Registered: 2015-02-15
Posts: 2,885

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

TDPlane wrote:

Approaching KBOS, the ATIS of KORH (Worchester Regional) was blasting. This kept on for almost 25 minutes. Changing the frequency or the frequency band could not silence it. Is there a solution?

How can i get the same on my side? What should I do exactly?

Please read a FAQ before you post a bug http://support.jardesign.org

**J.A.Romanov** · 2018-02-18 08:38:05

J.A.Romanov
Admin
Offline

Registered: 2015-02-15
Posts: 2,885

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

TDPlane wrote:

I noticed this: The pitch of the aircraft changes abruptly. There's no subtle change between holding steady at an altitude restriction and the subsequent descent to the next waypoint. It's a split second thing and it feels uncomfortable.

I just rework this (happen mostly during 250/10000 crossing)

Will include this in next beta.

Also, beta 5 will get new feature - instant flightplan generation.

Please read a FAQ before you post a bug http://support.jardesign.org

**J.A.Romanov** · 2018-02-18 08:46:06

J.A.Romanov
Admin
Offline

Registered: 2015-02-15
Posts: 2,885

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

thomas_99 wrote:

Hi !
Crash / CTD while entering flight plan departure from eddl:
Flight Plan:
EDDL SID KUMIK Y854 BOMBI T721 LAMGO T721 SUL T732 GARMO STAR EDNY
Cycle 1603
[SASL INFO] "bbox"
[SASL INFO] "bbox" >>> zulu 13:55:26
[SASL INFO] "bbox"    baro alt=137 / rad alt=1
[SASL INFO] "bbox"    air spd=0 / gnd spd=0 / mach=0
[SASL INFO] "bbox"    GW=175065 / FOB=9869 / CG=28
[SASL INFO] "bbox" vert wait = ALT
FMGS: 173 : Add points: 1
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,CA,0,52.0,2,600,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,DF,DL050,51.331608,6.861822,0, ,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,DL058,51.354350,6.912764,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,BAM,51.327758,7.176983,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,ANAVI,51.311964,7.388458,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,DEGOM,51.164208,7.673856,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,2,15000,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,KUMIK,50.836586,8.073325,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 195 : Add points: 8
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,CA,0,52.0,2,600,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,DF,DL050,51.331608,6.861822,0, ,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,DL058,51.354350,6.912764,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,BAM,51.327758,7.176983,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,ANAVI,51.311964,7.388458,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,DEGOM,51.164208,7.673856,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,2,15000,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : add Leg: KUMI3J,TF,KUMIK,50.836586,8.073325,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
FMGS: 197 : Add points: 8
FMGS: 198 : JARDesign FMGS plugin ver.V3B4-140218 detect crash.
FMGS: 198 : Memory dump saved to fmgs.dmp file
FMGS: 198 : Please send this log.txt file and fmgs.dmp file (from X-Plane folder) to support@jardesign.org !

to debug this, be better if you can allow me get this crash with your navdata folder and your co-rte file. If possible - contact me skype j.a.romanov for this.

Please read a FAQ before you post a bug http://support.jardesign.org

**J.A.Romanov** · 2018-02-18 08:51:17

J.A.Romanov
Admin
Offline

Registered: 2015-02-15
Posts: 2,885

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Ok, I read all your reports / videos. Thanks a lot!!!!

We should not have crash, include wrong pilot operation case. Fo this - please post dumps if this happen and (if possible) - description what can i do to get the same crash on my side. If I have dump, i can fix crash 80%. If i can get this crash on my side - 100% can be fixed.

Now we expect b5 with new feature - flightplan generaion. So, need enter EDDM/EDDF at Init A page and select <REQUEST on next page.

Please read a FAQ before you post a bug http://support.jardesign.org

**MrGeeBee** · 2018-02-18 10:33:59

MrGeeBee
Member
Offline

Registered: 2017-04-14
Posts: 60

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Griff wrote:

I too just watched the video and unfortunately, you were a victim of an "incomplete MCDU" which should have allowed you to insert the proper arrival/transition for RWY 23. Manually adding fixes appears to be the only solution at this time until JAR can at least acknowledge that the MCDU is not complete. Had you been able to properly add the transition route from LBV (or initial approach fix ELBE) it would have taken you on a course of 066 for 21.8 miles from LBV. Then a procedural turn to PISAS or a point 9.3 miles from the RWY at 3000 feet. Then, the landing would have been much easier to manage along with your altitude, speed, flaps deployment, etc during approach. Looking forward to a complete MCDU......

Yes, I'm using Pilot2ATC and this is how the plan looked there, but transition is not in the MCDU, it always give No Transition:

I
1100 version
CYCLE 1802
ADEP EGLL
DEPRWY RW27R
SID BPK7F
SIDTRANS BPK
ADES EDDH
DESRWY RW23
STAR RIBS4A
STARTRANS RIBSO
APP I23
APPTRANS LBV
NUMENR 19
1 EGLL ADEP 83 51.4775 -0.4613889
3 BPK DRCT 0 51.74974 -0.1067361
11 DIGSU N866 40000 52.02389 0.6347222
11 BANEM N866 40000 52.33556 1.505278
11 LEDBO N866 40000 52.54306 2.102222
11 ENITO M604 40000 52.80139 2.4675
11 DIBAL L603 40000 52.79722 2.5
11 BUKUT L603 40000 52.75834 2.800555
11 LAMSO L603 40000 52.7329 2.994356
11 VALAM UZ304 39900 53.03157 5.388484
11 GRONY UZ304 35000 53.10547 6.054969
3 EEL UM105 31000 53.16391 6.666675
11 DOBAK UN125 27000 53.21333 7.216944
11 DOTOB UN125 21000 53.28574 8.064905
11 AVESA UN125 20000 53.29333 8.157778
11 REVLA UN125 17000 53.32084 8.5075
2 WSN UN125 14000 53.34717 8.874733
11 SORUN T903 12000 53.52333 9.049444
11 RIBSO T903 40000 53.81277 9.340222
1 EDDH ADES 53 53.63039 9.988228

**thomas_99** · 2018-02-18 10:39:34

thomas_99
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-05-04
Posts: 235

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Hi !

ilankrt wrote:

thomas_99 wrote:
Hi !
Crash / CTD while entering flight plan departure from eddl:
Flight Plan:
EDDL SID KUMIK Y854 BOMBI T721 LAMGO T721 SUL T732 GARMO STAR EDNY
Cycle 1603 ......

What AIRAC cycle are you using? It should be
AIRAC cycle : 1802
Version : 1
Valid (from/to): 01/FEB/2018 - 28/FEB/2018
so it will be compatible to your plan-route

It's Cycle 16.03, and this is just fine because I'm using simbrief to plan the route and the free
cycle in simbrief is 16.03. So the planning of the route is OK. No need to update the cycle als long
as I'm not flying online.

best regards,

Thomas

**jcdp** · 2018-02-18 11:19:06

jcdp
Member
Offline

Registered: 2016-03-08
Posts: 380

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

thomas_99 wrote:

Hi !
ilankrt wrote:
thomas_99 wrote:
Hi !
Crash / CTD while entering flight plan departure from eddl:
Flight Plan:
EDDL SID KUMIK Y854 BOMBI T721 LAMGO T721 SUL T732 GARMO STAR EDNY
Cycle 1603 ......

What AIRAC cycle are you using? It should be
AIRAC cycle : 1802
Version : 1
Valid (from/to): 01/FEB/2018 - 28/FEB/2018
so it will be compatible to your plan-route

It's Cycle 16.03, and this is just fine because I'm using simbrief to plan the route and the free
cycle in simbrief is 16.03. So the planning of the route is OK. No need to update the cycle als long
as I'm not flying online.
best regards,
Thomas

Hi

When you start the Aircraft what do you see on the FMCU screen ? What are mentionned AIRACS ?
jcdp

I7 5930k @ 3,5Ghz , 32 Go Ram, NVidia 970 4Go , W10 64 bits, SSD 500Go , HD 3To
Moniteur Acer K242HQK (3840x2160)
CH Products : Flight Sim Yoke , Pro pedals
X-plane 11.41r2

**Wangenheim** · 2018-02-18 11:28:31

Wangenheim
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-09-07
Posts: 41

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

330 V3B4
При вводе INIT данных CRZ/TEMP 410/-48 -> CTD
В логе 2 полета, второй начинается на примерно на 1500 стоке лога.

Шаги:
1. Активация GPU по кнопке слева внизу экрана.
2. Включение батарей на оверхеде
3. Включение GPU на оверхеде
4. FMGS - ввод DEP/ARR - LKPR/UMMS
5. FMGS - ввод рейса - CSA615
6. FMGS - Align IRS
7. FMGS - CRZ/TEMP - 410/-48 --> CTD

Надеюсь поможет.
PS: Ввод типа 410, 410/ дают ошибку о некорректных данных

Post's attachments

fmgs.dmp 157.39 kb, 308 downloads since 2018-02-18

Log.txt 119.44 kb, 335 downloads since 2018-02-18

**thomas_99** · 2018-02-18 12:02:35

thomas_99
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-05-04
Posts: 235

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Hi !

jcdp wrote:

Hi
When you start the Aircraft what do you see on the FMCU screen ? What are mentionned AIRACS ?
jcdp

After start I see the primary (active) and secondary airac cycles...

They are route descriptions which are used when flying from airport A to B for instrumental flight.

best regards,

Thomas

**jcdp** · 2018-02-18 12:43:26

jcdp
Member
Offline

Registered: 2016-03-08
Posts: 380

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

thomas_99 wrote:

Hi !
jcdp wrote:
Hi
When you start the Aircraft what do you see on the FMCU screen ? What are mentionned AIRACS ?
jcdp
After start I see the primary (active) and secondary airac cycles...
They are route descriptions which are used when flying from airport A to B for instrumental flight.
best regards,
Thomas

Hi

What are they ? 1802 and 1410?

Others?

If the primary is different from the one you use this can be the source of your issue .

Best regards
jcdp

I7 5930k @ 3,5Ghz , 32 Go Ram, NVidia 970 4Go , W10 64 bits, SSD 500Go , HD 3To
Moniteur Acer K242HQK (3840x2160)
CH Products : Flight Sim Yoke , Pro pedals
X-plane 11.41r2

**demontraitor** · 2018-02-18 15:11:35

demontraitor
Member
Offline

Registered: 2017-05-27
Posts: 52

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Installed latest A330 and FlyWithLua

I was having issues with all my plugins locking up. X-Plane was fine but could not click on or movie any plugin windows, even the enable/disable plugin that comes with X-Plane. Removed some plugins out of action and all is finally okay after removing the latest A330 beta.

Anyone else getting this issue?

Demon.

**MrGeeBee** · 2018-02-18 15:57:52

MrGeeBee
Member
Offline

Registered: 2017-04-14
Posts: 60

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

demontraitor wrote:

Installed latest A330 and FlyWithLua
I was having issues with all my plugins locking up. X-Plane was fine but could not click on or movie any plugin windows, even the enable/disable plugin that comes with X-Plane. Removed some plugins out of action and all is finally okay after removing the latest A330 beta.
Anyone else getting this issue?
Demon.

No, can you attach the log when you try to load the A330?

**demontraitor** · 2018-02-18 16:06:52

demontraitor
Member
Offline

Registered: 2017-05-27
Posts: 52

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

MrGeeBee wrote:

demontraitor wrote:
Installed latest A330 and FlyWithLua
I was having issues with all my plugins locking up. X-Plane was fine but could not click on or movie any plugin windows, even the enable/disable plugin that comes with X-Plane. Removed some plugins out of action and all is finally okay after removing the latest A330 beta.
Anyone else getting this issue?
Demon.
No, can you attach the log when you try to load the A330?

Actually, I don't think it has anything to do with the A330... something bad has happened during a flight with Zibo 737... all the clickable regions, including the plugin windows have all moved up a few "inches" from their actual positions. If I want to click on any switches, or close plugin windows I have to click on some random area above the actual area I want to click on... totally screwed up my flight, an hour in a two hour flight... wtf!

**MrGeeBee** · 2018-02-18 17:55:00

MrGeeBee
Member
Offline

Registered: 2017-04-14
Posts: 60

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Ok, so I remade the same flight again:

https://youtu.be/rtp04yOjppA?t=8530

I inserted D066V before PISAS and it all aligned up perfect. The landing is a bit crap though... But that's not essential here.

**Griff** · 2018-02-18 22:08:23

Griff
Member
Offline

Registered: 2017-05-27
Posts: 35

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Yes, better approach and alignment. Strange oscillations though on approach so not sure if that is part of the plane or not....didn't look like the winds were that bad. Anyway, I've parked it until they complete the MDCU for approaches. It is starting to remind me of the Blackbox Airbus series for P3D with respect to the unfinished approach phases. Here's hoping beta 5 allows it.

**thomas_99** · 2018-02-18 22:51:08

thomas_99
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-05-04
Posts: 235

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

jcdp wrote:

thomas_99 wrote:
Hi !
jcdp wrote:
Hi
When you start the Aircraft what do you see on the FMCU screen ? What are mentionned AIRACS ?
jcdp
After start I see the primary (active) and secondary airac cycles...
They are route descriptions which are used when flying from airport A to B for instrumental flight.
best regards,
Thomas
Hi
What are they ? 1802 and 1410?
Others?
If the primary is different from the one you use this can be the source of your issue .
Best regards
jcdp

Hi.

It's 16.03 for primary and 14.10 for secondary. And the route is also planned with 16.03 Cycle.

And no, that is not the source for the CTD....

Best regards,

Thomas

**ilankrt** · 2018-02-19 00:17:06

ilankrt
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-10-20
Posts: 774

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Test flight LGIR - LLBG A330 v.B4 +X-Life + diverse plugins:
What shell I say, perfect flight from the first moment. Everything works well - even descending from FL310 with 60kt tailwind and no need to deploy speedbrakes. Engines also went silence as we are use to hear as passenger during the descent... Aircraft was stable at approach and landing (aircraft swinging occurs sometimes in the past..) My neighbour, a real world B777 pilot sitting near me to see how I am simulating landing was impressed from this airliner model (and I got this time also a positive feedback).

**Beerbog** · 2018-02-19 05:34:32

Beerbog
Member
Offline

Registered: 2018-02-09
Posts: 8

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

I loaded the A/C again today and couldn't get rid of the pink windscreens. I cant disable the rain effects (suggested in another post) in the A330 menu as it is missing from the plug in menu.

[ Closed ] v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests (Page 9 of 13)

Posts: 201 to 225 of 316

201 Reply by ilankrt 2018-02-16 23:01:53 (edited by ilankrt 2018-02-17 13:29:25)

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

202 Reply by ilankrt 2018-02-16 23:31:27 (edited by ilankrt 2018-02-16 23:34:26)

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

203 Reply by thomas_99 2018-02-17 18:25:55 (edited by thomas_99 2018-02-17 18:29:19)

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

204 Reply by ilankrt 2018-02-17 19:31:18

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

205 Reply by MrGeeBee 2018-02-18 01:46:16

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

206 Reply by Griff 2018-02-18 04:59:06

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

207 Reply by Beerbog 2018-02-18 08:00:53

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

208 Reply by J.A.Romanov 2018-02-18 08:35:09

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

209 Reply by J.A.Romanov 2018-02-18 08:38:05

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

210 Reply by J.A.Romanov 2018-02-18 08:46:06

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

211 Reply by J.A.Romanov 2018-02-18 08:51:17

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

212 Reply by MrGeeBee 2018-02-18 10:33:59 (edited by MrGeeBee 2018-02-18 10:37:23)

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

213 Reply by thomas_99 2018-02-18 10:39:34

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

214 Reply by jcdp 2018-02-18 11:19:06

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

215 Reply by Wangenheim 2018-02-18 11:28:31

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

216 Reply by thomas_99 2018-02-18 12:02:35

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

217 Reply by jcdp 2018-02-18 12:43:26

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

218 Reply by demontraitor 2018-02-18 15:11:35

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

219 Reply by MrGeeBee 2018-02-18 15:57:52

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

220 Reply by demontraitor 2018-02-18 16:06:52

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

221 Reply by MrGeeBee 2018-02-18 17:55:00 (edited by MrGeeBee 2018-02-18 17:55:20)

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

222 Reply by Griff 2018-02-18 22:08:23

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

223 Reply by thomas_99 2018-02-18 22:51:08

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

224 Reply by ilankrt 2018-02-19 00:17:06

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

225 Reply by Beerbog 2018-02-19 05:34:32

Re: v.3.0 beta 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 public tests

Posts: 201 to 225 of 316