[ Closed ] JD320 Airliner ver 3.2 r1,r2 WIN/MAC 64 bit (X-Plane 11) (Page 10 of 14)

everything work fine for me with jd320 and xp11.10rc3
fps 25-30

A320 JD works fine but the fmc freezes up the whole sim when clicking on any bottom of the fmc  preparing the fmc. I wanna thank JAR for the great airplane but  I also wanna make constructive comments about it . We know FF A320 ultimate is coming out to public soon, and i think A320 JAR needs some work done to make it competitive. Things done such the FMC, the rain windshield effects. Sometimes  the airplane does not follow VNAV path it goes off the path. I write this comments because I am not the only one that think this Im talking on behalf of a group of simmers. We hope to read any answers soon thank you.

@zippy77777 You are right in some part FF come out strong with the A320, but i think JARD can still make this plane very  competitive and also i think JARD should adjust their prices at least for the A320. I hope they really read our opimions and take some action  because many of us have been loyal costumers for years.

Another nonsense !!

Some simmer are not able to handle airliner like JAR A320/A330, or their equipment is not able to work with "heavy" software like XP11 + Airliner. Some other simmer don't understand how to deal with all the XP stuff including plugins. Last but not least some simmer are not willing to read and understand  how to do a correct simulation.

And some of them also won't understand that (until now) the FF A320 looks more like "hot Air". Yesterday I was looking at a video about the new FF A320 b made by Simtiles. Here my comment:
https://youtu.be/cB2nc7olUSA

"I was curious to see the differences between the FF and JAR A320 - None! Yes there are pop up windows, 2 active FMCU (not useful for one pilot) and a virtual iPad that is very nice (but I prefer to use my 2 iPads One for MCDU and the other for charts cloud). Summa Summarum, until now the "in depth" promise is absent ! Meanwhile I can present a long list of features that JAR A320 have (like online voice checklists, callouts at take-off. TOC, TOD and approach etc.)  Still waiting for the "big promises" being "Ultimate"... "

No doubt Until now JAR A320 has more to offer (incl. XL)

@ilankrt you really have no idea what you are saying bro. I am telling you i have JARD A320 and been flying the FF A320 and is a huge difference.

U didn't read first page ? http://jardesign.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=3243 JAR say very clearly with JD320 Airliner ver 3.2 r1 "be sure, that you use X-Plane 11.00-11.01"

May be in systems, but in textures, modeling, ground services, and many other things that make great JD.

The FF planes feel as they have no weight, no matter how much weight adds in passenger, fuel and cargo, completly unrealistic.

Under XP 11.11R1 I just finished a test flight (EPWA to LZIB) flying JAR A320  + X-Life without any problem on approach under ILS. Aircraft was also correct on GS. I am using Navigraph actual data base and SimBrief flightplan. You should look at some video tutorial and see if you probably are making any mistakes.....

If you can make a video from your landing, that will be the best thing to see what is going on....

If you use charts you have the exact flight level fo catching the GS. I encourage you to subscribe  "Navigraph Charts"...

BTW on PFD you can see if your FP includes ILS and the category... check also if you have the right ILS frequency in MCDU

Ideas may come from seeing the log.txt...

A very short flight today from LZIB to LHBP (under real weather conditions) ended in a crash. Why?
During the first landing attempt (ILS CAT III) in a heavy fog and unable to establish visual contact with the runway I saw during landing at 40ft over ground that the runway was 40ft on left side. I think  that this might be the fault of LHBP scenery designer because all MCDU inputs were correct (ILS 110.5) and on Navigraph chart I could see aircraft descending exactly on glideslope.

Then it became "criminally". Go-Around with full thrust, flaps and gear up, FL set to catch GS again, but MCDU don't let me fly the GA under AP. I tried to set a DIRECT fix but MCDU don't react and AP in parallel let aircraft fly in opposite direction.

Looking at the GS chart I descent again this time flying manually but with fuel on zero in the heavy fog I had no chance to reach the wrong placed runway:

I wrote this happening because I think the A320 MCDU must be rework in case of a Go-Around.

i wanna wish you all in this forum a merry xmas , happy holidays , specially to the Jardesign team that works hard to please us with the quality of their products and that always listen to our petitions. Thank you.