[ Closed ] XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5 (Page 10 of 14)

**shanemontoya** · 2018-04-24 01:19:32

shanemontoya
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-04-22
Posts: 6

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

ilankrt wrote:

shanemontoya wrote:
v3r4
1. ZBAA RWY36R Go-Around route - why the aircraft draws such awkward turn like that?
2. Missing runway symbol ("="symbol)
3. Alt constraints below FL100 shouldn't show "FL" - 3940ft shouldn't be FL3940 right?
4. From cold and dark, why the RAT is deployed?
5. After takeoff, the ND went out however the zoom function of the ND is still available.
6. Forget one thing during engine start - before clicking the ENG1, the EPR indication in the EWD rotates violently - I just used keyboard for my engine input, no hardware throttle control.
7. F-PLN in selected mode - the curved f-pln is still solid, but the rest of the straight lines are dashed.
I am using the latest stable version of XP11.
Please fix them in the next version.
You should begin with a Cessna 172. It is the best way to learn how to fly and use instruments correctly......

ha? a simmer calls a RL airline guy to learn 172 first? all right you win.
As a winner, please explain why the ND shows FLXXXX when the ALT is below FL100; or why the f-pln drawing algorithm is unable to handle some leg drawing. Regarding the drawing, if I remember correctly, dating back in 2015 JAR320 could do perfect curve drawing for some interesting approach like the DME ARC in ROAH.

**Franz007** · 2018-04-24 18:14:08

Franz007
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-04-15
Posts: 101

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

Homer.Simpson wrote:

Franz007 wrote:
@Homer and Ilankrt: i doubt Simbrief is an accurate base. Or do you seriously think its more accurate than PFPX? Without comparaisons with real tables like i've done its useless. And below 3 hours of flight its also quite useless since the main difference appears during cruise. And on short flights you wont remark that difference because 5%-7% could be also because of winds differencies or differences in take off / approach performances. So its not an accurate way to compare.
Anyway: it was about the A330 and not the A320 (to Ilankrt)
So as long as nobody can show that the values are correct based on REAL tables like i've done, do we have a chance that these wrong fuel burning values will be fixed in future? But as it seems there are no developpers reading here?
Today I did another fuel test flight. Duration: 6,5h of flight. As source I used a real world OFP for an A330-243 and simulated the flight which took place at the same time.
As per OFP I should have used 31100kg.
As per vacating the runway I have used 27600kg, so only 89% of the planned trip fuel
AT the middle of the flight I only used 93% of the fuel I should have used.
So I'm still not getting your results.

At least quite a big difference as well. On my flights i ALWAYS had around 20% less than calculated with PFPX. And theses values are matching with the instant fuel burning i measured (in Kg/h depending on altitude and weight). Yesterday Eugeny sent me the FCOM he based his plane on and i'm still seeing around 18-20% of differences. He said he will look into it in future and fix it but not for now. So i will try to corrigate the values by myself. The thing is that the take off performance also seems quite wrong, so it makes sense that the performance is not well calibrated for now. I hope i will be able to fix it with Plane-Maker, already did for some other planes...

**ComRPM** · 2018-04-28 17:37:05

ComRPM
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-09-08
Posts: 104

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

As you can see in the attached image, TCAS not work.
Captured during the last Cross The Pond Vatsim event. The other aircraft is only 1000 ft below.

Post's attachments

a330_4.png 1.9 mb, 213 downloads since 2018-04-28

**ilankrt** · 2018-04-28 21:09:37

ilankrt
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-10-20
Posts: 774

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

ComRPM wrote:

As you can see in the attached image, TCAS not work.
Captured during the last Cross The Pond Vatsim event. The other aircraft is only 1000 ft low.

I think that you must distinguish between JAR X-Life AI aircraft on route and sim aircraft flying under VATSIM .....
I would like to know if other airliner model flying under VATSIM have other planes on radar?

**summitlake** · 2018-04-29 08:34:51

summitlake
New member
Offline

Registered: 2018-04-29
Posts: 1

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

total a perfect aircraft...but for me ...no Tcas sound warnings also.... only the little white moving sqares..in critical approach in the air... the TRAFFIC TRAFFIC, climb climb .... is missing.
running the latest world traffic 3

**ilankrt** · 2018-04-29 12:47:28

ilankrt
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-10-20
Posts: 774

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

summitlake wrote:

total a perfect aircraft...but for me ...no Tcas sound warnings also.... only the little white moving sqares..in critical approach in the air... the TRAFFIC TRAFFIC, climb climb .... is missing.
running the latest world traffic 3

Let me ask you, why should JAR take care about the interconnection between his product and a foreign provider of a plugin ?! Maybe you should ask WorldTraffic developer about his efforts to connect between his plugin and JAR !

**ComRPM** · 2018-04-29 15:32:38

ComRPM
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-09-08
Posts: 104

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

I flyed a lot fo hours in Vatsim with this awesome A332. With the V1 version TCAS worked perfect in Vatsim. With this V2 version dont.

**ilankrt** · 2018-04-29 19:19:23

ilankrt
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-10-20
Posts: 774

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

ComRPM wrote:

I flyed a lot fo hours in Vatsim with this awesome A332. With the V1 version TCAS worked perfect in Vatsim. With this V2 version don't.

It can depend on both sides JAR and VATSIM and on compatibility between their programs, but here also I think that it is not the task for JAR to test if TCAS works under VASIM.....

**ComRPM** · 2018-04-29 22:52:52

ComRPM
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-09-08
Posts: 104

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

Repeat, the V1 330 version works like a charm in Vatsim. The problem is Vatsim or the V2 version?...

**Daniel Regueira** · 2018-05-04 16:00:31

Daniel Regueira
New member
Offline

Registered: 2017-06-22
Posts: 2

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

I suggest that we can write to the fmc from the keyboard instead of clicking with the mouse towards the letters as the flightfactor does

**Daniel Regueira** · 2018-05-04 22:07:25

Daniel Regueira
New member
Offline

Registered: 2017-06-22
Posts: 2

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

The ground handling does not work, it appears but does not move except the tank truck and the gpu

**ilankrt** · 2018-05-05 13:57:40

ilankrt
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-10-20
Posts: 774

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

Daniel Regueira wrote:

The ground handling does not work, it appears but does not move except the tank truck and the gpu

Go to plugin/GroundHandling/setting and activate the ground vehicles you want....

**Alex R** · 2018-05-06 13:26:32

Alex R
Member
Offline

Registered: 2018-05-06
Posts: 7

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

ilankrt wrote:

ComRPM wrote:
I flyed a lot fo hours in Vatsim with this awesome A332. With the V1 version TCAS worked perfect in Vatsim. With this V2 version don't.
It can depend on both sides JAR and VATSIM and on compatibility between their programs, but here also I think that it is not the task for JAR to test if TCAS works under VASIM.....

Dear Ilankrt,

the same problem occurs when flying on IVAO.

I appreciate you've got an opinion.
But I totaly disagree.

From a Sim pilot point of view, i must say that the best experience is flying online with a good model.
I cannot say how much i like the JD models.
You bought the JAR to have a good one, but the fact still remains, that the next step is flying online...and things are then getting complicated.

From a customer point of view, i must admit that in service support is really well organized at Jardesign.
I dont know if you work with them, but i cannot understand such answers like : "this is not JD responsaibility. This is Ivao/Vatsim role to take care of their client compliance with our product"
it's like airbus said : we design an aircraft, but we dont care about regulations or safety, we remove all tcas, because ATC is the job of ATC services.
This model is kinda expensive. We all buy it for enjoying realistic experience. But nowaday, still no Wx radar compatible with Xenviro (another expensive add on) and no TCAS compatible with the both major Virtual flight organization.

To conclude, i will continue to spend money in good products in order to fly online, with accurate weather, operative Wx Radar and TCAS. Hope it will be with Jar because i know what they are able to do.

**JMF1982** · 2018-05-10 13:12:16

JMF1982
New member
Offline

Registered: 2018-05-10
Posts: 1

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

I have the xactly same problem with the pink screen when the rain effect is ON in the FMC.

Anyone solved this?

Wr269 wrote:

Had issues activating it.....after entering my serial and restarting XPLANE, the pilots disappeared but the windscreen still was pink and had those small squares as it does when the aircraft is not activated.
It all went away if I disable Rain Effects in the FMGS...if I enable the rain effects, the windscreen goes back to pink with those small see through squares.

**ComRPM** · 2018-05-11 11:13:33

ComRPM
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-09-08
Posts: 104

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

I haved this problem with the r3 version and cant repair it. With r4 version the problem go out and work perfect. I dont know where the problem was.

Reinstall it and try, or wait for the r5 version without the rain effects in the windscreen.

**Peter092** · 2018-05-19 12:30:41

Peter092
Member
Offline

Registered: 2018-02-09
Posts: 27

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

post deleted by its author - Sorry.

**Alex R** · 2018-05-19 17:52:57

Alex R
Member
Offline

Registered: 2018-05-06
Posts: 7

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

Dear ComRPM,

did you find any fix to you (our) issue concerning TCAS ?

thanks

ComRPM wrote:

As you can see in the attached image, TCAS not work.
Captured during the last Cross The Pond Vatsim event. The other aircraft is only 1000 ft below.

**ilankrt** · 2018-05-20 10:00:53

ilankrt
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-10-20
Posts: 774

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

Peter092 wrote:

Good morning, everyone,
I would like to share with you the problem I have with the A330.
Unable to make an approach: EHAM - ILS06 via NORK2A
Here is a video of the flight EDDF - EHAM : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ol5bDy … sp=sharing
flight plan : EDDF SID MARUN Y152 ARPEG Z850 HMM UL602 RKN STAR EHAM
Start: EDDF - 7R - MARUSE
Finish: EHAM - 06 - NORK2A
0'00 to 4'12 : MCDU programming
4'12 : Approch activate
9'09 : Problem 1
9'44 : Resumption of the flight by a heading + "direct to"
11'14 : Problem 2
14'40 : An attempt at a new approach

You made so many mistakes that means - you should look at some tutorials and learn how to fly this bird! It begins that you overloaded fuel so you couldn't land safe with the amount left after flight (yellow warning) and it ends with the un-managed ALT (4000ft) situation flying over the APPR altitude (look at MCDU ALT and the red point on PFD) - you didn't know how to managed APPR catching ILS !

https://youtu.be/QBiJdeJtg-g

**ilankrt** · 2018-05-20 10:16:01

ilankrt
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-10-20
Posts: 774

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

did you find any fix to you (our) issue concerning TCAS ?
thanks
As you can see in the attached image, TCAS not work.
Captured during the last Cross The Pond Vatsim event. The other aircraft is only 1000 ft below.

First of all I doubt your statement about the position of the other aircraft !!
Second you should know better about the distances and time for TCAS to give us alert!

I am getting constantly TCAS alerts in appropriate situations all the time.
https://youtu.be/NiVK3qktukk

**Alex R** · 2018-05-20 11:32:35

Alex R
Member
Offline

Registered: 2018-05-06
Posts: 7

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

Hi,

Concerning Traffic/TCAS.
My issue is no audio, nor visual alert (no spot on the ND) concerning online traffic.
Appart from AI traffic, there are no spots on the ND, from closest range (RA volume) to farther (intruder volume)
On the other hand, i see the plane and the label for online traffic, so XP11 is able to display the aircraft in accordance with data received from the network.
In my view, JD TCAS doesn't work, but it could / should. (I believe it worked before R4 release.)

Concerning Wx Radar :
as support team said it was not compatible with Xenviro. I disabled Xenviro, i flew with defaut Xp11 real weather for more than a week now.
As i approached Areas with TS, CB (as described on metars and observed on ground),
i checked 5 times i was tilt down, gain max, and of course wx radar activated > nothing, only black on the ND.
with light rain i honestly think that this weather should have been displayed as yellow/green cells.
In my view, JD wx Radar doesn't work as it should.

have any of you experienced similar situation ?

ilankrt wrote:

did you find any fix to you (our) issue concerning TCAS ?
thanks
As you can see in the attached image, TCAS not work.
Captured during the last Cross The Pond Vatsim event. The other aircraft is only 1000 ft below.

First of all I doubt your statement about the position of the other aircraft !!
Second you should know better about the distances and time for TCAS to give us alert!
I am getting constantly TCAS alerts in appropriate situations all the time.
https://youtu.be/NiVK3qktukk

**Alexr03** · 2018-05-20 15:00:55

Alexr03
Member
Offline

Registered: 2018-05-12
Posts: 6

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

Hello,

I am experiencing both the issues you are describing in Alex R.
However, in the JD320 TCAS does work and so does the weather radar, just seems to be an issue with this beautiful plane

**ComRPM** · 2018-05-20 20:21:15

ComRPM
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-09-08
Posts: 104

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

Yesterday fliying Vatsim approaching to EGKK needed to go around due to a another traffic without any TCAS message or view in ND.
I opened a Jar ticket one week ago without any response from Jar...

**wilkur** · 2018-05-22 08:27:22

wilkur
Member
Offline

Registered: 2016-04-28
Posts: 9

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

Hello Jardesign-team,
first of all: X-Life works really well and with the editor it's fun to add air traffic to airports.
If I understand X-Life correctly, air traffic is only generated for airports for which metadata is available - i.e. which have a meta station.
Wouldn't it be possible to deposit a nearest metar station for an airport? Then you would also have air traffic at small airports.
Best regards

**Black4956** · 2018-05-22 16:14:13

Black4956
Member
Offline

Registered: 2017-08-02
Posts: 15

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

Hi Ilankrt,

I was watching some replies made by you in the past. I do not like the way you are reacting. Obviously you suppose you
are the only one in this universe who is able to fly this bird, the rest of the world are idiots.
Why don't you consider the possibility that there are still some bugs. I don't know the role you are playing.
Apparently you are somebody who lost the opportunity being objective. Please come down from your throne and
treat customers how they deserve. You are always defending JARDESIGN. Anyway you have to admit that there
are still enough bugs which have to be solved.

By the way I recommend you to take a glimpse at the commercial vendor support. I repeatedly posted my problems
I'm still suffering from. No reaction! Maybe you know this saying: Ignorance is the wig of intellectual baldness!

with kind regards

**ilankrt** · 2018-05-22 22:22:00

ilankrt
Member
Offline

Registered: 2015-10-20
Posts: 774

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

Black4956 wrote:

Hi Ilankrt,
I was watching some replies made by you in the past. I do not like the way you are reacting. Obviously you suppose you
are the only one in this universe who is able to fly this bird, the rest of the world are idiots.
Why don't you consider the possibility that there are still some bugs. I don't know the role you are playing.
Apparently you are somebody who lost the opportunity being objective. Please come down from your throne and
treat customers how they deserve. You are always defending JARDESIGN. Anyway you have to admit that there
are still enough bugs which have to be solved.
By the way I recommend you to take a glimpse at the commercial vendor support. I repeatedly posted my problems
I'm still suffering from. No reaction! Maybe you know this saying: Ignorance is the wig of intellectual baldness!
with kind regards

I seems that you (and some other user) have a problem with the fact that I am simulating constantly with JAR A330 +X-Life without any serious problems! If it works on my machine, there is no reason why it should not run on yours as well. In 90% of the cases problems are owner system inherent. That has nothing to do with Ignorance. The only real ignorant is the one who don't want to internalise this fact: JAR A330 is flying as it should...

[ Closed ] XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5 (Page 10 of 14)

Posts: 226 to 250 of 328

226 Reply by shanemontoya 2018-04-24 01:19:32 (edited by shanemontoya 2018-04-24 01:22:00)

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

227 Reply by Franz007 2018-04-24 18:14:08

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

228 Reply by ComRPM 2018-04-28 17:37:05 (edited by ComRPM 2018-05-02 13:21:28)

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

229 Reply by ilankrt 2018-04-28 21:09:37

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

230 Reply by summitlake 2018-04-29 08:34:51

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

231 Reply by ilankrt 2018-04-29 12:47:28

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

232 Reply by ComRPM 2018-04-29 15:32:38

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

233 Reply by ilankrt 2018-04-29 19:19:23 (edited by ilankrt 2018-04-29 19:20:19)

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

234 Reply by ComRPM 2018-04-29 22:52:52

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

235 Reply by Daniel Regueira 2018-05-04 16:00:31

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

236 Reply by Daniel Regueira 2018-05-04 22:07:25

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

237 Reply by ilankrt 2018-05-05 13:57:40

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

238 Reply by Alex R 2018-05-06 13:26:32

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

239 Reply by JMF1982 2018-05-10 13:12:16

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

240 Reply by ComRPM 2018-05-11 11:13:33

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

241 Reply by Peter092 2018-05-19 12:30:41 (edited by Peter092 2018-05-20 12:11:13)

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

242 Reply by Alex R 2018-05-19 17:52:57

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

243 Reply by ilankrt 2018-05-20 10:00:53 (edited by ilankrt 2018-05-20 10:45:30)

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

244 Reply by ilankrt 2018-05-20 10:16:01 (edited by ilankrt 2018-05-20 10:23:55)

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

245 Reply by Alex R 2018-05-20 11:32:35

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

246 Reply by Alexr03 2018-05-20 15:00:55

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

247 Reply by ComRPM 2018-05-20 20:21:15

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

248 Reply by wilkur 2018-05-22 08:27:22

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

249 Reply by Black4956 2018-05-22 16:14:13

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

250 Reply by ilankrt 2018-05-22 22:22:00 (edited by ilankrt 2018-05-22 22:22:48)

Re: XP11 JD330 v.3 r1,r2,r3,r4,r5

Posts: 226 to 250 of 328