Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
GoodDay Captbullett.
Actually, there is no ATIS in the list... 
I don't understand why.
The correct frequency is set on the RMP.
My actual airport is LFBO (ATIS is 118,02).
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
ivota wrote:
I just watched my video form twitch TV again.
The blinking started at 0h:38min:33sec.Possible problems:
1.In that moment, I bring (show) IVAP (IVAO pilot client).
2.Also, on ND there was traffic, TCAS become yellow square.
I just finished test flight at night. NO ISSUE !!!! hm..
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Good day,
gosh i do not know radios are above my pay grade after this... it's going to take a Privileged Group member to take a look see ...
captbullett
Le Docteur wrote:
GoodDay Captbullett.
Actually, there is no ATIS in the list...
The correct frequency is set on the RMP.
My actual airport is LFBO (ATIS is 118,02).
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
that's good to here ...
ivota wrote:
ivota wrote:I just watched my video form twitch TV again.
The blinking started at 0h:38min:33sec.Possible problems:
1.In that moment, I bring (show) IVAP (IVAO pilot client).
2.Also, on ND there was traffic, TCAS become yellow square.I just finished test flight at night. NO ISSUE !!!! hm..
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Good day,
I just was at an online conference where the Airbus was one of the stars so, I must share the A320 was being designed by Autodesk and here is a link to a video on the new airframe design ...
captbullett
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
RW at KSOF was 28L
This is where i got the route from as this is what they are assigning in real world just so you know where I got this from.
http://flightaware.com/analysis/route.r … ation=ksan
captbullett wrote:
good day,
can i also have the take off runway and landing RW will work on it nowthis is the main route i will use and insert the SID and STARs you are using since, I use Navigraph also,
KSFO SID AVE J1 DERBB J7 REYES J1 FIM J7 LAX STAR KSAN
http://onlineflightplanner.org is the planner I use I has a A320 FP txt designer already to download once you make your route also you can use it for the A330 also it make life easy ...
tngarner wrote:Seeing an issue on the DP out of KSFO to KSAN. Using AIRAC 1512 from Navagraph
Routing: OFFSH9 MCKEY LAX BAYVU3
Issue is with the OFFSH9 DP No transition - see FMS.png
From SENZY you fly 203 to the 151 radial of PYE (Point Reyes) If you map this out there is no way you will ever make the radial prior to WAMMY. It does not look to me like WAMMY is a mandatory fly over point.
The MCDU seems to force the plane back over WAMMY. See NAV.PNG
Here is a link to the DP. https://skyvector.com/files/tpp/1512/pd … FSHORE.PDF
32 2015-12-02 00:32:52 (edited by captbullett 2015-12-04 17:31:49)
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
good day,
Thank-you in conference now please give me a few mins. here is what I am looking at
http://au.autodesk.com/au-online/live-s … ive-stream
tngarner wrote:
RW at KSOF was 28L
This is where i got the route from as this is what they are assigning in real world just so you know where I got this from.
http://flightaware.com/analysis/route.r … ation=ksancaptbullett wrote:good day,
can i also have the take off runway and landing RW will work on it nowthis is the main route i will use and insert the SID and STARs you are using since, I use Navigraph also,
KSFO SID AVE J1 DERBB J7 REYES J1 FIM J7 LAX STAR KSAN
http://onlineflightplanner.org is the planner I use I has a A320 FP txt designer already to download once you make your route also you can use it for the A330 also it make life easy ...
tngarner wrote:Seeing an issue on the DP out of KSFO to KSAN. Using AIRAC 1512 from Navagraph
Routing: OFFSH9 MCKEY LAX BAYVU3
Issue is with the OFFSH9 DP No transition - see FMS.png
From SENZY you fly 203 to the 151 radial of PYE (Point Reyes) If you map this out there is no way you will ever make the radial prior to WAMMY. It does not look to me like WAMMY is a mandatory fly over point.
The MCDU seems to force the plane back over WAMMY. See NAV.PNG
Here is a link to the DP. https://skyvector.com/files/tpp/1512/pd … FSHORE.PDF
Good day
getting back to this OFFSH7 was the one on my MCDU , Ok I finished the route and I can say the Zig,zag route in the plan at the end when you get ready to land; the A320Ne can do the first zig the bus missed just a little but when it turned for final Approach it turned on a dime and is what i would say is correct ... is it perfect maybe not but I did not pay 100.000 $ for the simulator either ...
captbullett
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Anyone using AirFMC with the latest beta? Since ver 2.6, The ipad display for me is now corrupted. Worked great on 2.5. Jar A320 is supposed to be supported. I emailed them, but no response yet. Just wondered if changes in 2.6beta 1 and 2 has caused an incompatibility issue with AirFMC.
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Good Day,
Q1; have you contacted AirFMC this is the developer that is probably needing to fix something
Q2: since I am not using AirFMC how is it connecting to the sim WiFi and what port ... is it working on another aircraft try first if you could so you can isolate to a JAR issue ... thank-you
captbullett
rogerwolfe57 wrote:
Anyone using AirFMC with the latest beta? Since ver 2.6, The ipad display for me is now corrupted. Worked great on 2.5. Jar A320 is supposed to be supported. I emailed them, but no response yet. Just wondered if changes in 2.6beta 1 and 2 has caused an incompatibility issue with AirFMC.
35 2015-12-02 15:49:00 (edited by rogerwolfe57 2015-12-02 15:51:15)
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Yes, I have contacted them a week ago, but no response as yet. Good idea! Will load up another plane and try it there. It auto connects through the computer's ip address although it seems to use a different udp port than indicated in the instructions. I will check what port when I load it up again.
36 2015-12-02 16:27:33 (edited by rogerwolfe57 2015-12-02 16:28:49)
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
OK...works flawlessly on FF a350 and 757 so I assume it is an issue with A320 betas. Specs indicate UDP port of 2425. Now display duplicates perfectly the init and perf pages, but flight plan screen is black.
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Hi !
rogerwolfe57 wrote:
OK...works flawlessly on FF a350 and 757 so I assume it is an issue with A320 betas. Specs indicate UDP port of 2425. Now display duplicates perfectly the init and perf pages, but flight plan screen is black.
I'm sorry, but it even does not show the first page correct:
And not the perf page:
And yes, the flight plan is empty....
best regards,
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Yes, I see that now. Not sure of significance, but responsiveness of ipad fmc keys is quite sluggish; not so with the other aircraft
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Hi,
Actually solved ! 
IVAP plugin is the bad boy
captbullett wrote:
Good day,
gosh i do not know radios are above my pay grade after this... it's going to take a Privileged Group member to take a look see ...
captbullettLe Docteur wrote:GoodDay Captbullett.
Actually, there is no ATIS in the list...
The correct frequency is set on the RMP.
My actual airport is LFBO (ATIS is 118,02).
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Hi,
short flight from eham to egll, with this FP
GORLO UL980 XAMAN L980 LOGAN
Report problem wiht FP-Discontinuity, and insert AP
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Good day,
usually is and with a log.txt I would have see you have that installed and asked you to uninstall first and foremost and you would have been on your way ...
Your friend,
Brian
Le Docteur wrote:
Hi,
Actually solved !
captbullett wrote:Good day,
gosh i do not know radios are above my pay grade after this... it's going to take a Privileged Group member to take a look see ...
captbullettLe Docteur wrote:GoodDay Captbullett.
Actually, there is no ATIS in the list...
The correct frequency is set on the RMP.
My actual airport is LFBO (ATIS is 118,02).
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Aileron still buggy. Very annoying.
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
good day,
thank-you now we are getting some ware we just need to hear from the man himself now this is above my Pay-grade and i do not have AirFMC but good to know it's a JAR thing ... to figure out...
captbullett
thomas_99 wrote:
Hi !
rogerwolfe57 wrote:OK...works flawlessly on FF a350 and 757 so I assume it is an issue with A320 betas. Specs indicate UDP port of 2425. Now display duplicates perfectly the init and perf pages, but flight plan screen is black.
I'm sorry, but it even does not show the first page correct:
And not the perf page:
And yes, the flight plan is empty....
best regards,
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Hello everyone, how come in this release I do not find the folder NavData?
How do I update the Cycle?
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Airbus.Italia wrote:
Hello everyone, how come in this release I do not find the folder NavData?
How do I update the Cycle?
X-PLANE 10/Custom Data/GNS430/navdata/
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
X-PLANE 10/Custom Data/GNS430/navdata/
The Cycle info of the folder navdata is 1509 , but , the Cycle in fmc is diferent. Why?
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
captbullett wrote:
good day,
thank-you now we are getting some ware we just need to hear from the man himself now this is above my Pay-grade and i do not have AirFMC but good to know it's a JAR thing ... to figure out...
captbullettthomas_99 wrote:Hi !
rogerwolfe57 wrote:OK...works flawlessly on FF a350 and 757 so I assume it is an issue with A320 betas. Specs indicate UDP port of 2425. Now display duplicates perfectly the init and perf pages, but flight plan screen is black.
I'm sorry, but it even does not show the first page correct:
And not the perf page:
And yes, the flight plan is empty....
best regards,
Response from Haversine:
"Hi,
Sorry for the delay; sounds like the A320 is messing up the FMC screen; AirFMC and the plugin just read what is made available in each line through data refs.
So almost definitely an A320 bug; the A330 has a similar bug / problem where it mixed up the screen. I reported it to JAR Design but still waiting for a fix.
sorry about it,
nothing we can do at this end,
joao @ haversine"
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Good day,
I have the same thing but it is reading from up-dated cycle in GNS430 file ... I do believe .. I am still trying to figure out but i do not want to fix something that is working very good right now so give me some time.. please ... but your issue is being tract...
captbullett
Airbus.Italia wrote:
X-PLANE 10/Custom Data/GNS430/navdata/
The Cycle info of the folder navdata is 1509 , but , the Cycle in fmc is diferent. Why?
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Good day,
i did not forget you I ran into a scenery issue and had to reinstall KSFO but the up-date looks good I also had to re-configure so, I can do an Alpha test on the ATC on this run also since this is a co route ... right ... anyway have to sleep now and your up in the am ...
captbullett
tngarner wrote:
RW at KSOF was 28L
This is where i got the route from as this is what they are assigning in real world just so you know where I got this from.
http://flightaware.com/analysis/route.r … ation=ksancaptbullett wrote:good day,
can i also have the take off runway and landing RW will work on it nowthis is the main route i will use and insert the SID and STARs you are using since, I use Navigraph also,
KSFO SID AVE J1 DERBB J7 REYES J1 FIM J7 LAX STAR KSAN
http://onlineflightplanner.org is the planner I use I has a A320 FP txt designer already to download once you make your route also you can use it for the A330 also it make life easy ...
tngarner wrote:Seeing an issue on the DP out of KSFO to KSAN. Using AIRAC 1512 from Navagraph
Routing: OFFSH9 MCKEY LAX BAYVU3
Issue is with the OFFSH9 DP No transition - see FMS.png
From SENZY you fly 203 to the 151 radial of PYE (Point Reyes) If you map this out there is no way you will ever make the radial prior to WAMMY. It does not look to me like WAMMY is a mandatory fly over point.
The MCDU seems to force the plane back over WAMMY. See NAV.PNG
Here is a link to the DP. https://skyvector.com/files/tpp/1512/pd … FSHORE.PDF
Re: ver 2.6 beta 2 WIN/MAC 64 bit
Hallo guys, yes, the NavaData cycle in GNS430, does not match the data cycle in the FMC.
How do I fix?