[ Closed ] v.1.2b4 distributive (Windows 7/8, MAC OS) (Page 3 of 4)

Yes on my flight back from HEGN to EDDL I was very suprised about how much fuel the A332 took as well. Loaded 37t of fuel (according to a real flight plan for that flight an PW powered A332 should fly that route with 30t (reserves included)), my A332 had the exact weights of that real flight plan, but I landed the JAR332 with only 1.6t left in the tanks in EDDL...

Good day,
k

Somebody who loaded before a330 (Gizmo?) eat all nearest memory.

I have 32GB of Ram and 4gb Vram which one is affected by gizmo?

CTD with 1.2b4, XP 10.40b9 (sorry, I know I shouldn't report using a beta build of XP...)
Win 7 64-bit.

YBBN --> YBCS. CTD during the right turn on the CORAL4 departure, RWY19.

Logs attached.

Love the A320, and want to love the A330, but it's making it difficult.

I know these things are as frustrating for the devs as they are for the users. Always appreciate the excellent support from JAR!
Eric

Just wanted to say that with 10.40b6 and the 1.2r4 everything went smooth on a training flight LIMC-LIMC (departed via a SID and came back via a STAR) and also on the flight EGLL-LIMC on VATSIM. And the new weather radar works perfectly aswell!

Good day,
That's very good but beta testing is on version (10.40B9) so, it really does not help with testing ...and notes are out so, you can see the changes...
captbullett

good day,
if you check the disable the windshield effects in Special viewing options on the XP rendering options stuff to draw  settings if you are running any of the beta 10.40 's and lower your settings in Special Effects and see if you can get a better view you can't get rid of all of it but you will get a better view.
captbullett 

This is not a bug, it happens if you call the supply trucks from plugin A330.

It should be called by the plugin GroundServices.

Greetings

Edit: If you notice the new fuel pipe is different from that in the photo.

I think the true way - "beta" test something one - x-plane beta with 100% worked airplane or aircraft beta with 100% worked X-Plane. Else - nobody know where from problems come.

LR know about fuel problem and we discuss it today a long time. I hope they will solve this. Hope.. without aircraft changing. Just for info.

Good day,
Yup, I don't think this helps so much because, if you do this right you have a main copy which is 10.36 then you have your beta copy of XP which should be up-dated to current beta, 10.40B9 to do any real testing otherwise testing is out dated and that is the short of it.

Therefore, XP does not do patches on the beta versions ... because if you do the right set-up you have main XP and then you have beta set-up any,  other copy then current beta version is old news and can't be good news.

I am,  not trying to give you a time about it nevertheless, trying to explain, the way I was told how this works... and after testing many beta versions in Apple beta testing for Apple OS X operating system ... also, I do know there has to be a set way to beta test not just any way any one wants to test that is why there are "Alpha beta" testers and then there are beta testers ...

Since, we need good information I want you to think before, you post is , this going to help JAR  improve the aircraft or is it going to take up server space and should I delete it, I ask myself this question before, posting. Sometimes, I do not know an answer and need help and I do have to ask a question so, ask and think how to ask a smart question ...

So, let's help JAR and let the posts be smart in what we post not redundant or, a version of a beta that is old and out dated what information can be used from this when we are on beta 9 and all the fixes are in on beta 6 and we have moved far passed that version... and either 10.36 "stable" or 10.40B9  "current beta" are the versions that JAR can use to help advance his aircraft development ... 
thank-you for your input,
captbullett
Apple Developer