[ Closed ] JD320 Airliner ver 3.2 r1,r2 WIN/MAC 64 bit (X-Plane 11) (Page 5 of 14)

An answer to this question would be appreciated too.

hey guys I am using Saitek panels but every night my panels are blank the back light on them is off for the nd and everything I hit the panel switch but nothing happens anyone know a fix

Hello!

I have the same problem and i have notice that only some flight plans are loaded without apparent reason.

This file are read correctly:
filename : LIMCLICJ.txt
content : LIMC LAGEN GIANO LICJ

This are loaded but no flight plans appear on the FMS :

filename : LICJLIMC01.txt
content : LICJ GIANO ELB IDONA VOG LIMC

Also i have the SASL error message in red, this appear only for a fraction of second.

In addition, writing with the mouse is very uncomfortable. Please give the chams to write with the computer keyboard.

My OS is Windows 10 and my friend have the same problem with W7.

Best regards , Luca.

P.S.

This is the content of the tmpplan.txt file found in the FlightPlans folder:

1 LICJ pointtype=APT routepart=APT_DEP show_nom=1 next_act=1 lat=+038.181944 lon=+013.099444 alt_min=65 alt_max=65 cst_min= cst_max= prof=0 eutc=0 efob=0 part= dist=0 brg=0 awy= freq= crs= pass=0
2 DISC pointtype=DISC routepart= show_nom=2 next_act=2 lat=+038.181944 lon=+013.099444 alt_min=nil alt_max=nil cst_min= cst_max= prof=0 eutc=0 efob=0 part= dist=0.001 brg=358 awy=DIR freq= crs= pass=0
3 LIMC pointtype=APT routepart=APT_ARR show_nom=3 next_act=3 lat=+045.630000 lon=+008.723056 alt_min=768 alt_max=768 cst_min= cst_max= prof=0 eutc=0 efob=0 part= dist=487.548 brg=336 awy=DIR freq= crs= pass=0
DIST=487.549

Maybe can help to solve the problem.

MAYBE I HAVE SOLVED

I have tryed to generate the flight plans file from simbrief:

filename : MPTOMMUN.txt

content : MPTO SID REMAL A574 TBG UA321 MORLI UA321 SPP UA552 FALLA UA552 PZA UR899 KITIS UR899 CTM UJ26 MID UJ18 AVATA STAR MMUN

Appear the problem was the missing SID and STAR in the flight plan.

As said in numerous post before, exiting replay when flying the Airbus A320 will set the thrust to max and the plain just takes off like a rocket.

I have made a small video (+2 minutes) that shows the issue:

https://youtu.be/x1X_XZjH-64

Its a very beautiful aircraft. No doubt on that. But it needs FBW fix so badly. The plane falls like a rock during landing, no matter how many times and how hard i have tried i can't get the aircraft down below -178 fpm. Whereas on FSLabs and Zibo's 737 i can land at -43 fpm. Please do something on this as the most important aspect of this beautiful aircraft depend on its handling.

Thanks

I have been flying simulators since FS98. My first airbus was airsimmer A320. Im not sure if you have heard about them.

The Average landing speed for an A320 is 130 to 140 kt. Again it depends on the landing weight of the aircraft. I believe for a 3% Slope the speed should be around 134kts.

you have not done the requested calculation ...

So with your above data for landing speed what would be vertical speed for a 3% glide slope ?

jcdp

I'm starting to think that r1 is the latest version and that reference to r2 was just a typo

Maybe check the calibration of your throttles, as I never have any problems getting it off the ground. 

Also, are you using flex power to TOGA?

It is obviously that every takeoff is different, depending of varying factors concerning aircraft and the environment. QNH and field elevation are some of the factors affecting performance, but there are others such as surface condition (wet, slippery, contaminated etc.), engine bleed extraction (are we running the packs off the engines or using anti-icing?) and aircraft C of G. As good as they are simulated the more near real is the simulated take-off situation. It is also obviously that the more correct simulated data in one or another simulation program will bring better results. Now we don't intend to go here into a discussion about who is who. If you think that FSLabs is the better one - stay with it. Nobody force you to use JAR A320...

Speaking for myself I made some measurements about runway length needed for takeoff in relationship to various takeoffs with JAR A320 under different circumstances and the numbers fits the reality.