Good day,
The information I posted above was only to show how to post a bug report not for the information inclosed and not to confuse the issue between the data between the A320 and the A330 this is why the rules are so important on the forum.
Since, I was trying to help with the issue at hand the X-Pilot did not realize that he was talking to a Mac platform tester and an Apple Developer and I was trying to point out to him how to post a proper post so, that he could get the help that he needed.
Nevertheless, I was cursed at in the most polite way and I will not help him any more since he made it clear he does not want my help.
The TDPlane was only an example not for information on the issue at hand TDPlane is a "Privileged" member of JAR and knows how to do a proper Bug post, My hat is off to him for setting up such a quick and uniform way to send a Bug report.
captbullett
J.A.Romanov wrote:It is necessary to place the information on the continuation of the work and 320 plans. There are plans for the implementation of the navigation display flight plan акщь 330 ещ 320. However, perhaps you know there is a problem in the 330 with CTD on MAC. If we take a piece of code from 330, this problem will be on 320. But we can not lose MAC OS users, sure. Therefore, we must first solve the problem of 330 and get code what worked w/o problems. We are working on it together with LR and SASL developers. While there is no result, but we continue to try and test, try different solutions. Just for info.